Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
This is a pseudo-sufficient assumption question.
P:All leaders in major parities oppose the bill
C:The bill will most likely fail to pass.
Target answer to connect no support with fail to pass.
Can someone give me some feed back on this? The reasoning denies a conclusion in order to show a premise is false. Is that an acceptable method of argumentation? I know that conditionally, if A->B, then negation B = negation A, but does that hold true ...
I found this question especially tricky because of what I perceive to be a logic gap in the stimulus. The critics argument can be boiled down to (Justified public funding) -& ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-20/
Hello guys, this MBT question actually comes from the MBT course video. Most people have the question about the last sentence "even its critics acknowledge." I have read all the ...
I have been analyzing all the June 2007 (public domain) questions one by one, and find that they all neatly fit into very neat symbolic argument patterns--except for Section II Question 24. I would appreciate any comments on this particular question, ...
Can someone help me out with this one? Apparently the correct answer is E, but I'm not particularly able to pin down the argument structure or understand what it is trying to say and why it is flawed in the respect indicated by the correct answer choice.< ...
So the correct answer is A. I'm really confused by the answer choices and the stimulus.
When I read it, I initially thought this is an extreme example that uses examples within examples because the whole point of the example is that people ...
Intuitively I thought what said in the argument is contradicting...I thought people usually learn from history and as they increase knowledge about history, they will know better about what is good or bad. (Do people read passages/stimuli related to your ...
The conclusion here is that "crying must have the effect of reducing emotional stress".
The first time I read the stimulus I thought the flaw/gap here was; we are not sure that crying itself decreases stress, maybe the hormones causes the ...
lawlz so this question is a monster, but watching JY's explanation helped.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-76-section-2-question-24/
He explains that the larger argument pattern is:
A --> absurd
not(absurd)
...
We are looking for a necessary assumption.
The conditional for the first sentence is: write in order to give pleasure /impart truth. However, the conclusion of the ...
Hi!
I was down to answers C and E and wasn't sure why E would be a better choice than C and vice versa.
I did watch JY's video and still have trouble figuring this out.
C- I thought this was supported by line 2-4. Wouldn't " ...
So I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulations a requirement not that they aren't actually safe because in the stimulus it says that they are all ...