HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt34 | 53 | 57 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q22 | 192 | 213 |
-
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT28.S3.Q08 - some environmentalists questionMy big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable …
My big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable of an assumption that is to make. Since this is a logically inferred question, I assumed that the right ... -
PT5.S3.Q12 - the number of north american childrenHi All, Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how…
Hi All,
Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how one gets to that answer. Thank you! -
PT2.S3.G2Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times . https://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times .
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-2/ -
PT41.S1.Q22 - routinely unpunished society's rulesCan someone please explain how we arrive at answer choice D from the stimulus? If I understand correctly, not routinely unpunished (/RU) equates t…
Can someone please explain how we arrive at answer choice D from the stimulus?
If I understand correctly, not routinely unpunished (/RU) equates to sometimes unpunished.
We get /RU by negating the chain presented in the ... -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... Problem Set 3; or PT28.s3.q26 also from set 3 ... -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT1.S3.Q25 - on the basis of their statements**Point at Issue Argument Summary:** S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/v…
**Point at Issue
Argument Summary:**
S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/visually distasteful or (2) caring for it becomes inconvenient. This right to ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT28.S3.Q16 - historian: we can learn aboutHey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same. A. None of the mercury introd…
Hey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same.
A. None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
Negated: some of the mercury introduced ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... 2.
PT01.S3.Q11 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q21 - proportion
PT01.S3.Q12 - average
PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ..."Even If" Statement in Conjunction with ConditionalHi All, Let's say we have the conditional statement "If I go to the market and go to the mall, then I will reward myself with ice cream." Then …
... a point of reference, PT71.S3.Q11 is what prompted this ...PT34.S4.G4 - each of exactly six doctorsI've watched the explanation for this video...but one of the conditional statements still has me confused. Basically, J.Y combined a /J and a J, to m…
I've watched the explanation for this video...but one of the conditional statements still has me confused. Basically, J.Y combined a /J and a J, to make a conditional chain...can someone take a look at this video and break it down?
https:// ...The Dramamine questionAt 2:00 of his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-3-question-18/ ), J.Y. refers to "the Dramamine …
... his explanation video of PT57.S3.Q18 (https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations ...PT26.S3.Q10 - tires may be either underinflatedIm having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, do…
Im having a little trouble understanding why answer choice D is correct. I understood the flaw that an absence of proof for something to be false, does not make it true the minute i read it.
However the wording in Answer choice D is confusing me. ...PT27.S4.Q22 - words like "employee", "payee", and "detainee"Hey all, What's really tripping me up is that this question stem is written in the passive voice. The stem saying "could have remained unchanged i…
Hey all,
What's really tripping me up is that this question stem is written in the passive voice. The stem saying "could have remained unchanged in force and focus IF which one of the following had been advanced as a counterexample in place ...A logic questionis it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B? I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51. The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasonin…
is it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B?
I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51.
The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasoning.PT71.S3.Q26 - as advances in medical researchCan someone elaborate on why AC D is incorrect? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-26/
Can someone elaborate on why AC D is incorrect?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-3-question-26/PT33.S3.Q8 - stock marketI'm a little confused about why the video explanation shows the first sentence as PISM --most--> /DOR. I thought that the "without" would negate the…
I'm a little confused about why the video explanation shows the first sentence as PISM --most--> /DOR. I thought that the "without" would negate the first part of the sentence and it would look like /PISM --most--> DOR. If someone could explain ...PT5.S3.Q18 - private vs nationalized health insuranceI find myself struggling with Disagree questions. It's difficult to keep the moving parts together and find the overlap. Especially when there are em…
I find myself struggling with Disagree questions. It's difficult to keep the moving parts together and find the overlap. Especially when there are embedded clauses which obfuscate the domain of discourse or in particularly loooong questions such as this ...Warning: Recent RC Main Point QuestionsHi All, I've made an observation regarding Main Point questions on some of the most recent RC passages (70s primarily). I was reading a post on th…
... - answer choice D & PT74.S3.Q9- answer choice E for ...PT69.S1.Q22 - company president: most of ourIt's the problem about sales representatives. I've read several explanations about this one on the Manhattan/PowerScore boards and sort of understand…
It's the problem about sales representatives. I've read several explanations about this one on the Manhattan/PowerScore boards and sort of understand them, but am still really struggling because I just don't get how B is the correct answer. I can see how ...Compendium of "uncommon" vocabulary on the LSATAlthough the LSAT is not supposed to test your vocabulary, in certain cases, deriving correct answers requires knowing the definitions of words that …
... /> 'Idiosyncratic' ~ PT 69 S3
'Impasse' ~ PT 69 S3
'Laudable' ~ PT ... 69 S3
'Posterity' ~
'Reconcile' ~
'Relinquished' ~ PT 69 S3
"Semblance' ~ PT 69 ...PT51.S4.G3 - a locally known guitarist's demoHi all, I have a question on how I am supposed to read a certain rule in sequencing games. The fifth rule in this game states: Each rock classic i…
... in an earlier PT (PT20 S3 Game 3), such mechanics did ..."Accurate and Complete List" Type QuestionsHey guys, Got a great question from a student that I thought you could help with. Here it is! -------------------------------------------------…
... Thompson case?" (PT 69 G4 Q22), would we have to check ...PT34.S2.Q18 - editorialist: the positions advancedI got the MP but I wanted to further analyze... Could someone review my thought process please? (This is a question in CC!) Part of the stimulus: …
I got the MP but I wanted to further analyze... Could someone review my thought process please? (This is a question in CC!)
Part of the stimulus: "But there is a positive role to be played even by these extremists for the social & ...
