Can someone help me to identify opponent's argument, since I don't see clearly where is a conclusion and where are premises. All I see is a set of premises with unstated(assumed) conclusion. Thank you!! #help
What range of PTs should I be using now that the drill function uses a wider range of PTs? Any admin help would be greatly appreciated as this is a point of worry for me at the moment.
For this question answer choice C is correct which makes sense to me. I picked D because I thought the analogy between car technology and computer technology worked well. My question is: are answer choices with analogies usually wrong on strengthening ...
Could anyone provide an example of a stimulus or anything that fits into the answer C? It doesn't actually have to be matching the content in C, just the form of "confusing x with y".
@dcdcdcdcdc said:
A is wrong because it could be that her daughter is just very wise at birth. Isn't this the same as saying a tree could just start off with a lot of rings?
Thanks for your response Jonathan, my question was about PT35.S1.Q18. I think a mod edited my post when I originally posted it, and put int he wrong question. I've just seen it and changed it back.
> @AllezAllez21 said:
> Just real quick, the question you're referring to is from PT35. Might want to update the title if possible. I'll look at it and get back to you.