HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt46 | 37 | 47 |
-
problem understanding negative/double negative/triple negative statementsguys, I am having a huge problem understanding negative/double negative/triple negative statements, whether they are an answer choice or in stimulus…
Whenever I encounter a double negative that gives me trouble, I rephrase it in my own words. PT46.S2.Q10 is a good example of this. You can rephrase "X is not indispensable" to "X is not essential." -
January LSAT Accountability ThreadHey guys. So if you're like me, you took the November LSAT, are unhappy with your results, and are studying to re-take in January. I've seen accounta…
... from PT4-PT6. Blind Reviewed PT46. Nearly done with the RC ... -
Does "No Cause, No effect" strengthen/weaken causation logic?For causation logic, I know for strengthen questions, there are a few ways to strength an argument 1. eliminate alternative cause 2. when cause h…
... for certain questions. Check out: PT46/S2/Q17. The correct answer ... -
7Sage Study Group BreakoutAre you a 7Sage user looking for people to study with? Wish there was an easy way to get paired up? You're in luck! Join us for our next "Study Gr…
@"Scott Milam" S2 and S3 are showing as the LR sections for my PT46 on the Drills + prep test tabs... would you be able to advise?
