http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-4-question-07/
This question asks us to identify a flaw.
Attorney: I ask you to find Mr.Smith guilty of assaulting Mr.Jackson. Regrettably, there were no eyewitness to the crime but Mr.Smith ...
Any fruit that is infected is also rotten. No fruit that was inspected is infected. Therefore, any fruit that was inspected is safe to eat.
The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?
I think SoA is incorrect because: let's pretend there are two subdivisions, A and B. Let's say sub A contained houses of $1mil and sub B had houses costing half million. Let's say someone like Bill ...
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thing to claim that a statement is wrong( false) and another to claim that the person making it is in the wrong ...
The conclusion reached above depends on which one
of the following assumptions?
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
The pre-Columbian inhabitants of Mexico
played games on all ceremonial occasions.
The making ...
I am confused about the logic translations seen in the video explanation for a particular LR question:
**LSAT PrepTest 49, Section 4, Question 16**
Link: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-49-section-4-question-16/
Can someone explain why D is the correct answer and not A? I feel like the passage suggests that kinglets do not participate in nocturnal behavior to find food.