Can someone help me out with identifying the flaw here? There's not an explanation video, so I've linked the question bank. Preptest C is at the bottom.
Hi Hello,
Can someone explain this question? As in, the correct ans. choice. I'm having a realllly hard time convincing myself that it's "necessary". #help
... cumulative 2.86 from 2010-14 as a result of being ... - the 2.86 from 2010-14, 4.0 from 2018, or ... 2.99 that combines 2010-14 and 2018? Do I bother ...
Here is my analysis for question 17 in section 3 for prep test 72. This is a weaken question; therefore, I wanted to weaken the connection between the premises and the conclusion.
Argument Analysis:
"If males are assigned to Veblen South, then Wisteria North is assigned males."
Can I take the contrapositive of this as such: "If Wisteria North is **not** assigned males, then Veblen South is **not** assigned males." And then translate ...
Hi fam!
So, This is your straightforward Sufficient Assumption Question. If you have a moment you can work out the logic and make your way to a correct answer. Sometimes however, you can see the elements you need to bridge the gap without writing ...