HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt50 | 93 | 104 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
| q6 | 66 | 76 |
-
PT60.S4.Q7 (P1) - Most Strongly Supports (New Urbanists)Someone please tell me why A is correct. I think SoA is incorrect because: let's pretend there are two subdivisions, A and B. Let's say sub A con…
Someone please tell me why A is correct.
I think SoA is incorrect because: let's pretend there are two subdivisions, A and B. Let's say sub A contained houses of $1mil and sub B had houses costing half million. Let's say someone like Bill ... -
PT10.S4.Q9 - There is is relatively little room for growthI'm thinking that maybe C is wrong because the mergers does no good to the market share, and the newly merged companies still have to gain market sha…
I'm thinking that maybe C is wrong because the mergers does no good to the market share, and the newly merged companies still have to gain market share by purchasing competitors. However, D indicates that since some producers have been squeezed out of the ... -
PT80.S4.Q23 - YXK is currently the television network with the highest overallI chose (A) but I really don't understand one thing. Can we say 'the highest overall number of viewers' is comparable to 'more leg injuries, on avera…
I chose (A) but I really don't understand one thing. Can we say 'the highest overall number of viewers' is comparable to 'more leg injuries, on average, than any other athletes'?
Admin note: minor title edit; please use the format of "PT#.S ... -
PTA.S4.Q16 - carcinogenic chemicalsHi, Can anyone explain why the answer is B instead of C? Why exactly is C wrong?
Hi,
Can anyone explain why the answer is B instead of C? Why exactly is C wrong? -
PTA.S4.Q8 - After an area has been hit by a natural disasterTo solve this necessary assumption question I used the technique of negating each answer, and then seeing which opposite answer choice would have to …
To solve this necessary assumption question I used the technique of negating each answer, and then seeing which opposite answer choice would have to weaken the argument. The one that must weaken the argument is the answer. However, here, I just can't ... -
PT89.S4.Q18 - Certain changes in North American residential architectureWhy is E wrong? Doesn’t E also give an alternative reason for why the houses architecture changed? <strong>Admin note: edited title; please use t…
Why is E wrong? Doesn’t E also give an alternative reason for why the houses architecture changed?
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]" -
PT2.S4.Q8 - Amino-acid decomposition in fragments of eggshellHi, everyone, Have trouble with this question. The correct answer choice C adds additional information ("climate fluctuations") which is not provi…
Hi, everyone,
Have trouble with this question. The correct answer choice C adds additional information ("climate fluctuations") which is not provided under the stimulus. Does it mean you can add additional information by guessing, however, ... -
PT2.S4.Q18 - some cleaning fluidsHello, In this particular question I was wondering between C and E. Answer D is correct, however. I crossed out this question since D does not me…
Hello,
In this particular question I was wondering between C and E.
Answer D is correct, however. I crossed out this question since D does not mention "benzene" and only "formaldehyde".
E choice looks the best because according ... -
PT11.S4.Q8 - cigarette smoking and excessive consumption of candyCould someone please explain this for me. I understand that A's wrong because it doesn't paraphrase the MP completely B and D's are wrong for…
Could someone please explain this for me.
I understand that
A's wrong because it doesn't paraphrase the MP completely
B and D's are wrong for obvious reasons.
I picked C but half-guessed it.
#help ... -
PT1.S4.Q13 -- press reports on political campaignsHi, When I did this question, I got stuck between B and D, even after I used the negation technique for assumption questions. Why exactly is D here…
Hi,
When I did this question, I got stuck between B and D, even after I used the negation technique for assumption questions. Why exactly is D here wrong?
For context, I thought D could be an answer too because when voters are ... -
PT34.S4.G4 - biconditionalBasically, my _issue_ is with the whole explanation from JY. But for discussion sake let's focus on Q23. If you read the question paragraph or qu…
Basically, my _issue_ is with the whole explanation from JY. But for discussion sake let's focus on Q23.
If you read the question paragraph or question stem without reading Q23, you will figure out that J and K are bidirectional i.e. cannot ... -
PT1.S4.Q4 - State researchers have foundThe conclusion of the stimulus is that the decline in energy consumption is due to (1) reduced standards of living and (2) changes in the way p…
The conclusion of the stimulus is that the decline in energy consumption is due to
(1) reduced standards of living and
(2) changes in the way people spend their time
So we are looking for 4 answers that fall into one ... -
PT1.S4.Q8 - Baysville Chamber of CommerceMary Simms (outdoor advertising rep): "Billboards are the basis of **_our business_**. If they are torn down, our ability to earn a living will be se…
Mary Simms (outdoor advertising rep): "Billboards are the basis of **_our business_**. If they are torn down, our ability to earn a living will be severely damaged.
Jack Jordan (local merchant): "The basis of **_our business_** is an ... -
PT11.S4.Q5 - Large quantities of lead dustHi there. I'm truly confused about this question even if I have scanned the possible right explanations from other platform. Link1: https://www.manh…
Hi there. I'm truly confused about this question even if I have scanned the possible right explanations from other platform.
Link1: https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q5-large-quantities-of-lead-dust-t5368.html
Link2: http:// ... -
PTA.S4.Q3 - Pit vipers are so called#help# Can anyone explain how B is justified in supporting this hypothesis? I didn't see any relevance between strategies of defence and the …
#help#
Can anyone explain how B is justified in supporting this hypothesis? I didn't see any relevance between strategies of defence and the two functions of infrared sensor.
Admin note: edited title; please use the ... -
PT82.S4.Q21 - Restaurant critic: Most people agree that the foodI chose (E). I had thought that the discrepancy was how is it that a restaurant with worse food could be more popular. Assuming this is the discrepan…
I chose (E). I had thought that the discrepancy was how is it that a restaurant with worse food could be more popular. Assuming this is the discrepancy, would (E) not justify the conclusion? We are told Traintrack has a better location and this brings in ... -
PT7.S4.Q13 - The National Assoc. of Fire Fighters says#help This question gave me trouble but I think I understand now. Here's my explanation, please let me know if it's right. Conclusion: early detec…
#help This question gave me trouble but I think I understand now. Here's my explanation, please let me know if it's right.
Conclusion: early detection of fire is no more likely now than it was 10 years ago
Premise1: 10 years ago 30% ... -
PTC.S4.Q8-- juvenile delinquencyHi, Can anyone help explain why the answer here is E instead of C? I understand why A,B, and D are wrong, but I just don't understand why C is wrong…
Hi,
Can anyone help explain why the answer here is E instead of C? I understand why A,B, and D are wrong, but I just don't understand why C is wrong. I felt the main idea of the passage was that we need to reform the way we rehabilitate child ... -
PT30.S4.Q20-- consumer advocate: the introduction of a new drugHi, Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only be…
Hi,
Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only being one truly right answer because both A and B here seem to strengthen the stimulus-- A just ... -
PT5.S1.Q6-- historian: alexander the greatHi, this was a weird LR question that I thought somebody might have some insight on. I used Process of Elimination to find that E was the only po…
Hi,
this was a weird LR question that I thought somebody might have some insight on. I used Process of Elimination to find that E was the only possible right answer, but I was not completely sure how E was the right answer when it stated ... -
PT31.S4.Q22-- impasse between subjective and objective philosophersHi, For some reason, I just found this question really difficult. I was really kind of stuck between B and E, and I wasn't sure about either of t…
Hi,
For some reason, I just found this question really difficult. I was really kind of stuck between B and E, and I wasn't sure about either of them because it is hard to find direct textual evidence that I can connect back to what the ... -
Improvement...?Hey everyone... I had done a drilled LR section (PT 74 S4) and got a -6 on 2/5 at the very beginning of my studies (before completing the CC) and I t…
... drilled LR section (PT 74 S4) and got a -6 on ... -
PT74-S4-Q3 (Spoiler Alert) Strengthening or Sufficient Assumption?Hey everyone, I got this question incorrect during a timed run yesterday because I was trying to find a sufficient assumption when for a strengthen q…
Hey everyone, I got this question incorrect during a timed run yesterday because I was trying to find a sufficient assumption when for a strengthen question lol.
Oh well, I'm curious as to whether you all think that this question can be ... -
PT9 S4 Q04Lately I have been having a lot of trouble with "must be true" questions. Can anyone explain why C was the correct answer choice for this question, a…
Lately I have been having a lot of trouble with "must be true" questions. Can anyone explain why C was the correct answer choice for this question, and not D?
Thank you! -
PT38.S4.Q14-- Help -- flaw in the argument questionHi, The answer here was D. However, I thought D here was wrong because the stimulus never explicitly mentioned anything about "total" emissions--…
Hi,
The answer here was D. However, I thought D here was wrong because the stimulus never explicitly mentioned anything about "total" emissions-- it just said that the cars spend more time spewing emissions. Can anyone explain to me why D ... -
PT38.S4.Q14-- help-- part 2Hi, So I got this question wrong because D looked wrong to me (D was actually the right answer). The stimulus is saying that reduced speed limi…
Hi,
So I got this question wrong because D looked wrong to me (D was actually the right answer).
The stimulus is saying that reduced speed limits do not protect the environment because it makes it so that cars spend more time ... -
PT38.S3.Q6-- help -- process of elimination questionHi, So this question was really bugging me: I was easily able to eliminate B, C, and D. However, E (which was actually a wrong answer choice) jus…
Hi,
So this question was really bugging me: I was easily able to eliminate B, C, and D. However, E (which was actually a wrong answer choice) just didn't look like it was found in the passage because although "meadows and glades" were ... -
PT4.S4.Q23-24These were so hard. I got number 23 right at first, but wrong after a blind review. I don't understand why answer choice D is not a necessary ass…
These were so hard.
I got number 23 right at first, but wrong after a blind review. I don't understand why answer choice D is not a necessary assumption. Isn't it important that the brains of twins aren't any more likely to suffer from ... -
PT38.S4.Q13-- a recent study revealsHi, Can anyone explain why B here is 100% wrong? I thought that B could weaken the argument because it could state the conclusion of the study is…
Hi,
Can anyone explain why B here is 100% wrong? I thought that B could weaken the argument because it could state the conclusion of the study is wrong.
Thanks!
Any #help would be appreciated!
