HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt52 | 85 | 105 |
| rc23 | 0 | 0 |
-
TONIGHT! PT52 BR | 8:30pm ET<h1> PT52 BR Tonight at 8:30pm ET</h1> Don't miss out on tonight's PT52 blind review group, featuring none other than the infamous ... <center> …
PT52 BR Tonight at 8:30pm ... miss out on tonight's PT52 blind review group, featuring none ... -
BR Group (The one WITHOUT Mike Kim): September 30th: Weds (PT52)<img src="http://thinkinglsat.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/cropped-logo.jpg" > </center> <h1>WEDNESDAY, September 30th at 8PM ET: PT52</h1…
TONIGHT! PT52 BR | 8pm ET<h1>TONIGHT! PT52 BR | 8pm ET</h1> We may not have... <img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CE3xwwaVIAEb4Hy.jpg" > </center> for our BR Gro…
TONIGHT! PT52 BR | 8pm ET
... /> Are you ready to BR PT52?
If not, take ... PT52 NOW and join us at ...TOMORROW! Monday Morning BR Group: Nov 9th: (PT52) 11:00 AM EST!!!!<img src="http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3Rifby1tVE8/hqdefault.jpg" > </center> <h1>...for Group BR</h1> <h1>MONDAY, November 9th at 11AM ET: PT52</h1>…
... , November 9th at 11AM ET: PT52
Click here to join ...Anyone up for peer BR call this weekend on PT52? - Update: Sat 3/13 @ 2PM CT**Update**: I didn't get a chance to coordinate times with some of you who commented with interest, but I'm available Sat 2PM Central Time onwards to…
... see you then!
Topic: PT52 LR/RC sections
Time ... take all 4 sections of PT52 this Friday and I'm ...Taking PTs as part of 7sage LSAT prep that have been taken to study for the LSAT in the pastHello, I've just realised that when I first wrote the LSAT (June 2012), I took PT52 to PT60 to "prepare." This was before I discovered 7sage and …
... LSAT (June 2012), I took PT52 to PT60 to "prepare." This ...PT52.S1.Q19 - educator: it has been argued that our professional organizationhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-19/ I came to realize that my trouble with this question is that I mistakenly assumed …
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-19/
I came to realize that my trouble with this question is that I mistakenly assumed a PREMISE (more likely to determine policy by electing officer than through direction vote) was a ...Getting better until I get worse?Okay so I'm pretty much at my wit's end here with the last 2 or 3 tests I've taken. As background, I used to be incredibly consistent on the Logic…
PT52.S1.Q10 - reduce traffic congestionSo where is the key piece of evidence that I should really focus on in this question? The conditional is throwing me off. http://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
So where is the key piece of evidence that I should really focus on in this question? The conditional is throwing me off.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-10/PT52.S1.Q25 - sociologist: widespread acceptance of the ideahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-25/ From a common sense stand point, the necessary assumption makes sense. So beca…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-25/
From a common sense stand point, the necessary assumption makes sense.
So because blah blah is injurious to democracy, then legislators should not do something. Why ...PT52.S3.Q25 - some people mistakenly believehttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question-25/ Can someone please explain this question to me? It's the principle question and m…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-3-question-25/
Can someone please explain this question to me? It's the principle question and mentions distant periods etc. The correct answer choice is A and I literally have no idea how it is ...PT52.S1.Q22 - moralist: a statement is whollyI found this comment posted on the PT explanation page And I was wondering if anyone could answer what this person has to say because I'm in the same…
I found this comment posted on the PT explanation page And I was wondering if anyone could answer what this person has to say because I'm in the same exact position as this them. If you could watch the pt explanation video or look at the question than look ...Goal 155-ishMy goal score is 154-157, and I'd be really happy with anything in that range. My question is: what should I be PTing at so that I am safe to get a s…
... 3 weeks ago 160
PT52 Sep 2007 2016-08-26 ...[Study Guide]: Principle Question SubtypesFor those of you on the PT 55 BR call -- sorry it took me so long to get this up, but below are my notes on Principle questions and subtypes. Please …
... be approached with caution.
-PT52, Section 3, Question 11 provides ...PT52.S1.Q24 - in response to several bacterial infectionsI know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong. Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be…
I know answer choice B is not supported but I can't explain to myself WHY it's wrong.
Is it wrong because the terms "apple" and "citrus" should be switched places? Could it be a right answer choice if the answer choice actually read:
...PT52.S3.Q07 - gotera: infants lack the motor abilityCan someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus? I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence f…
Can someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus?
I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence fits into the conditional framework. It doesn't seem like it plays a role there.
..."besides" meaning except for or includingI don't know if "besides' meaning except for or including, which are the opposite meanings. For example, for PT52, the conclusion says 'So legislato…
... opposite meanings. For example, for PT52, the conclusion says 'So legislators ...PT52.S1.Q14 - for one academic yearThis resolve the paradox... just not understanding it in the least. Any help will be much appreciated. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-s…
This resolve the paradox... just not understanding it in the least. Any help will be much appreciated.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-14/Sudden jump in scoreI've taken about 7 or so full PTs thus far, in addition to going through the CC (for the most part--I'm taking in September so I needed to get starte…
... around 165-166. I took PT52 just now and got a ... />
WTF
Is PT52 just crazy easy or is ...Any advice for when your stuck in a score range?Hey guys I have been stuck inbetween 156-158 for the past 2-3 weeks and need some advice about how to proceed with my studying and ultimately achieve…
... and because I'm on PT52 of 72 for the package ...PT52.S3.Q22 - most economists believe thatHey yall, im back!! Just wanna make sure im understanding AC E [E] says that: "an increase in demand for consumer product is compatible with an inc…
Hey yall, im back!!
Just wanna make sure im understanding AC E
[E] says that: "an increase in demand for consumer product is compatible with an increase in demand for a competing product."
Here goes my thought process:
Since the ...Complaint/Critique: Inconsistent LG approachesThere are some situations where JY takes a different approach to a rule for no ostensible reason other than the fact that the ordinary approach would…
... approach in PT83 Game 2, PT52 game 4, PT51 Game 2 ...
