HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt54 | 80 | 116 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
-
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
DeleteDelete
... of one another (i.e. S4, Q3). When you have a ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Referential phrase: "otherwise"<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.S4.Game 4's last rule ... -
RedactedRedacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g. S4.LR1) and were justified as ... -
LR: You will choose to buy something vs. You will buy somethingHi 7sagers, Is there a difference in the meaning of the statements below? If you see the desk, you will choose to buy the desk. If you see the…
... in the stimulus of PT18/S4/Q7. The last sentence is ... -
PT75.S4.Q21 (G4)I don't understand how E can be the correct answer. There actually appears to be no correct answer. The LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and apply…
... page.
For PT75.S4.Q21 (G4), the [explanation page ... -
How to go back to curriculumI recently watched the "Post CC Strategies" webinar and something that he had mentioned as apart of the first phase of taking PTs is that we should b…
... all the questions in PT44.S4 (Starting from Q1) and PT49 ... .S4 (Starting from Q1).
: ... -
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game 4)
https://7sage ... -
PT28.S1.Q2 - If the economy weak, prices remain constant...I don't get why answer choices D could be true. Are you not supposed to consider the contrapositives of the answer choices or of what's in the stimul…
... : Souderton or Randsborough" game (PT34.S4.Game 4)
> https ... -
PT44.S4.Q7 - Since empathy is essential forI am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question: <font color="red">**Admin note:** edited; violation of <a href="https:…
... stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is ... -
PT44.S4.Q7 - Since empathy is essential forI am stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is the question: <font color="red">**Admin note:** edited; violation of <a href="https:…
... stumped by the question PT44-S4-Q7, and the following is ... -
PT1.S3.Q04, PT1.S4.Q21Totally dropped the ball on both of these. Help? For Q4: I thought D was totally wrong and I was completely sure of it because I thought to myself…
... military superiority.
**PT1.S4.Q21**
Remember, this ... -
The LSAT Content that Haunts YouI'm working through the logic games curriculum right now, and one of the example in/out games is the bird watcher game from the December 2000 preptes…
PT7.S4.Q19 - it takes 365.25 days
Still struggle with it lol -
Invalid Vs. Valid Argument Forms (When are these applicable?)I did see a post on distinguishing these argument forms a little while ago, but my question is when are these applicable? I only imagine that these a…
... -2-question-21/
PT27.S4.Q7 (Flaw): https://7sage.com ... -
False positives and false negativesHere is a concept which LSAT _sometimes_ tests: <font color="red">**false positive/false negative**</font> ------- I learned this concept a coup…
i'm just commenting on this to bump it up on the discussion posts bc this was really useful to me for pt54 -
False positives and false negativesHere is a concept which LSAT _sometimes_ tests: <font color="red">**false positive/false negative**</font> ------- I learned this concept a coup…
> @"surfy surf" said:
> i'm just commenting on this to bump it up on the discussion posts bc this was really useful to me for pt54
Glad it was helpful! :smiley: -
No idea how to identify an answer in harder flaw questions.SO it seems to be easy to own easy flaw questions but the harder ones...the answers are so vague! And I've been getting everyone of the harder flaws …
PT14 S4 Q9 is an incredibly difficult/obscure flaw question. It's probably the silliest question ever written for the LSAT, imo.
