HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt56 | 44 | 48 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.6K |
| q19 | 225 | 238 |
-
PT23.S2.Q14 - kim: in northern europe during the 18th centuryHey everyone! I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was block…
Hey everyone!
I'm pretty confused about this question. Could anyone speak more on why (C) is incorrect? I chose it because I thought it was blocking out an alternative cause to the cited change in attitude: philosophers spreading their ... -
PT27.S2.Q15 - it is often said that beauty is subjectiveHey everyone! Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I r…
Hey everyone!
Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I read over it now I can't seem to put my finger on why it's incorrect. The more I read (D), the ... -
[Google Form Link!] September Study Group | PT 49 | Sunday, June 11 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PST##Please fill out this form so that we know which questions to review ###https://goo.gl/forms/rrTrkoiQHoJSn7Ey2 Round 2! https://media.giphy…
... /> **Experimental Section:** LR#2 from PT56
(I recommend inserting the ... -
PT19.S2.Q24 - the united states ranks far behind countries such as swedenSo I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulati…
So I chose D because I thought that the conclusion of the stimulus was that the US is behind in the sense that they should make these safety regulations a requirement not that they aren't actually safe because in the stimulus it says that they are all ... -
PT10.S2.G4Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/
Was wondering if someone could give me an explanation in there osn words
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-10-section-2-game-4/ -
PT7.S4.Q19 - it takes 365.25 daysOkay so this one I really don't understand. The question talks about changing days of the year so that the days no longer shift. It states: Many …
Okay so this one I really don't understand. The question talks about changing days of the year so that the days no longer shift.
It states: Many scheduling problems could be avoided if the last day of each year, and an additional day every ... -
PT37.S2.Q05 - although consciousness seems to arise from physical processesIm having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choos…
Im having some trouble with this question so I chose A because I thought that this is what was needed to make the conclusion valid and I didn't choose B because it says " must encompass MORE than " and I took the conclusion to mean that physical theories ... -
September Study Group | PT 51 | Sunday, June 18 @ 7p EDT / 6p CST / 4p PSTThe efficiency last week was awesome. I think the google form worked greatly to streamline the process and cut down on wasted time contemplating whi…
...
**Experimental Section:** RC from PT56
(I recommend inserting the ... -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... of answer choice. (Ie. PT17.s2.q24 from Problem Set 3 ... -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
Hey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone could add to JY's explanation for #26 and explain how (E) is supported? I chose (A), but I felt uneasy about ... -
PT13.S2.Q7 - It is not correct that people of the USHey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "…
Hey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "tax" isn't used differently throughout the passages. B basically says the author extended the meaning of ... -
PT73.S2.Q20Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D. The stem is that the argument relies on the assum…
Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D.
The stem is that the argument relies on the assumption, but my current understanding is that neither answer accomplishes this, though E has more ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT29.S1.Q19 - arbitrator: the shipping managerHi guys! I wanted some insight into why A qualifies as a right answer for this question. The argument is saying that the manager should be blamed/…
Hi guys! I wanted some insight into why A qualifies as a right answer for this question.
The argument is saying that the manager should be blamed/is responsible for the project's delay because he was aware that the contractor often runs late ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
"Mathy" Questions drilling?Sharing this in hopes that it might be useful to some: In an effort to feel more comfortable with "mathy" questions (involving proportions, percen…
... - percent
PT02.S2.Q04 - average
PT02.S2.Q14 - average
PT02.S2.Q16-17 - percent ... -
PT15.S2.Q17 - Most people believe that yawningHi, I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain wh…
Hi,
I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain why this is incorrect?
When I was doing this question, I noticed two errors in ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class? -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneHey everyone, So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61. This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand h…
Hey everyone,
So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61.
This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand how conditionals work, but this question just doesn't work for me no matter how many times ... -
PT79.S4.Q19 - archaeologist: neanderthals, a human-like speciesSo this is a weakening question. I was torn between two answers during the test, and switched from the right answer to the wrong answer. I see wh…
So this is a weakening question. I was torn between two answers during the test, and switched from the right answer to the wrong answer.
I see why the correct answer is correct but not why the wrong one is wrong.
The ... -
PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ... -
PT32.S4.Q19 - editorial: medical schools spendHello, 7Sagers! I'm a bit puzzled with this NA question and wanted to get your input on the matter. This question states that medical schools a…
Hello, 7Sagers!
I'm a bit puzzled with this NA question and wanted to get your input on the matter.
This question states that medical schools are teaching curative medicine and preventative medicine at a 10:1 ratio ... -
PT11.S4.Q19 - the proposal to extend clinical trialsCan someone please help me with this question. Been sitting on it for 2 hrs
Can someone please help me with this question. Been sitting on it for 2 hrs -
PT19.S2.Q18 - in the past decadeCan someone please breakdown this question for me?? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/
Can someone please breakdown this question for me??
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/ -
PT3.S2.Q25 - the public in the united statesI can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts? Flaw Argument Summary: Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a …
I can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts?
Flaw
Argument Summary:
Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a substantial defense budget.
Premise 1: X is gone.
Conclusion: ... -
A logic questionis it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B? I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51. The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasonin…
is it logically valid to conclude that if A-->B, then A+C -->B?
I am reviewing S3 Q19 from PT 51.
The correct AC seems to mobilize this reasoning. -
PT12.S2.Q7 (G2) - five childrenSo I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so sh…
So I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so should we assume that they need to be played at least once unless stated otherwise? Thank you!!! -
PT44.S2.Q20 - research indicatesSo i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/l…
So i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/
