HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt59 | 66 | 73 |
| s3 | 910 | 1.3K |
| q15 | 159 | 175 |
-
Logic Games : [Never Together/Always Together] v. [Not Both] Rule ConfusionHello, During In-Out Games, I am consistently getting confused between the Not Both Rule and the Biconditional (Always Together/Never Together) R…
... />
For instance, in PT29 S3 Game 1, the second rule ... -
PT48.S3.Q14 - although the rights of native peoplesHey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner…
Hey, guys. I think I got this one but I'm seeking clarification. I was between A, B and C and chose A. I think C is correct because a "property owner" is defined in lines 15-21 and A and B are incorrect because they describe how one can obtain ownership. A ... -
PT17.S3.Q20 - morton: in order to succeedWhat does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something? In …
What does it mean when an answer choice, as is the case in PT17, Sec. 3, #20, Answer D, says, "Fails to consider the status..." of something?
In other words, in this instance, what is the definition of "status"?
https://7sage.com/ ... -
PT52.S3.Q07 - gotera: infants lack the motor abilityCan someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus? I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence f…
Can someone explain how they were able to tease out the conditional elements in this stimulus?
I'm having trouble seeing how the second sentence fits into the conditional framework. It doesn't seem like it plays a role there.
... -
PT10.S3.Q01 (P1)- oil companies need offshoreHello guys, So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1. I understand why answer choice A is correct, …
Hello guys,
So I just completed the BR on this passage, and I am still tripped up on question 1.
I understand why answer choice A is correct, expect for the bit concerning "oil companies". Can someone point me to where this ... -
PT63.S3.Q21 - Weed-killer datahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/ I'm trying to understand this passage fully... I thought the data on the eff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/
I'm trying to understand this passage fully...
I thought the data on the effects of the weed-killer would be misleading when it was drawn from studies of the ... -
PT33.S3.Q04 - limited research indicatesHello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question. Context: Therapeutic intervention be…
Hello I have a question regarding the method of identifying an assumption. This is a strengthening question.
Context: Therapeutic intervention before the occurrence of mental disorders can mitigate factors known as major contributor to them ... -
PT2.S2.Q15 - a well-known sports figurePlease help. I don't understand why (C) is wrong. Stimulus: No combining publicity appearance and competition. So it is "not both" rule. …
Please help. I don't understand why (C) is wrong.
Stimulus: No combining publicity appearance and competition. So it is "not both" rule.
PA-->/Competition, or it could be Competition -->/PA
... -
PT27.S3.P2 - personal names are generally regardedI have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the ques…
I have done this passage 3 times and have gotten 4 wrong every time. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this passage and has found the questions to just be too hard. I normally go -3 to -5 but dang I don't even know what happened here...
... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ... -
PT40.S3.Q11 - historian: one traditional childrearing practiceThis question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable. Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads t…
This question is strange -- the correct answer is not properly inferrable.
Many child psychologists believe that the childrearing practice leads to lower self-esteem in children, which leads to those children having less confidence as adults ... -
"Misreading"Hi All, I would love to get some feedback from you guys about how you approach the issue of "misreading" questions in any of the sections, but spe…
... I first read PT58.S4.Q15, I could not for the ... -
PT24.S3.Q10 - all material bodies are divisibleI'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question. `All material bodies are divisible into parts,` Ma…
I'm having trouble understanding the translation for the conditional logic to this question.
`All material bodies are divisible into parts,`
Material bodies --> Divisible
`and everything divisible is ... -
PT22.S3.Q24 - if g is assigned to team 1This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements migh…
This guy JY shifts from a correct CBT answer choice to a MBT answer choice in the question straight after. I understand why some of the elements might be fixed in certain positions for the GLQ arrangement on Team 1 in Q23, but wouldn't you have to test all ... -
PT24.S3.Q11 - Special kinds of cotton that grow fibershttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/ When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I coul…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-3-question-11/
When I was timing myself, this question took me almost 2 minutes because I couldn't choose the right answer choice. I think I was not understanding the first sentence ... -
PT6.S3.Q24 - rumored declines in automobileI thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts a…
I thought that this was an example of a part to whole fallacy. The author concludes that the decrease in revenue is exaggerated because part (parts and service companies) of the industry have succeeded even after admitting that manufacturers' share of the ... -
PT64.S3.Q09 - in some jurisdictions, lawmakersI chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it say…
I chose D because all the other answers weren't strengthening the argument and the answer is A but the reason why I didn't pick it was because it says " that are proportional to the harm they BELIEVE to result from those crimes". We're not talking about ... -
PT35.S1.Q15 - statistician: a financial magazine claimed that its survey of itsI chose C because it is weakening the argument which is saying that people are more concerned about their finances than politics and C says that they…
I chose C because it is weakening the argument which is saying that people are more concerned about their finances than politics and C says that they are JUST AS concerned about their finances and politics thus weakening the argument and I thought E was ... -
PT28.S3.Q08 - some environmentalists questionMy big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable …
My big issue with this question is about why B is the correct answer. It seems to equate "exploiting" with "destroy" and I'm not sure how reasonable of an assumption that is to make. Since this is a logically inferred question, I assumed that the right ... -
PT5.S3.Q12 - the number of north american childrenHi All, Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how…
Hi All,
Any chance someone is willing to help me understand why the correct answer choice for this question is C? I cannot seem to figure out how one gets to that answer. Thank you! -
PT2.S3.G2Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times . https://7sage.com/lsat_ex…
Hi can someone help me with this game i am missing some of the big inferences and i have watched the explanation 4 times .
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-2/ -
PT27.S2.Q15 - it is often said that beauty is subjectiveHey everyone! Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I r…
Hey everyone!
Could anyone shed some light as to the issues with (D)? I didn't select it because I had an eerie feeling about it, but even as I read over it now I can't seem to put my finger on why it's incorrect. The more I read (D), the ... -
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... Problem Set 3; or PT28.s3.q26 also from set 3 ... -
PT51.S3.Q19 - style manaul: archaic spellings and stylesHi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the firs…
Hi I was just hoping someone could help me sort out the conditional logic in this stimulus. I feel like there's a gap in my understanding of the first sentence of the stimulus.
The first statement is about archaic spellings being preserved ... -
PT1.S3.Q25 - on the basis of their statements**Point at Issue Argument Summary:** S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/v…
**Point at Issue
Argument Summary:**
S: An owner of a work of art have the ethical right to destroy that artwork if (1) they find it morally/visually distasteful or (2) caring for it becomes inconvenient. This right to ... -
PT28.S3.Q16 - historian: we can learn aboutHey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same. A. None of the mercury introd…
Hey, y'all! I'm having a tough time negating some AC for NA. For AC A and B they don't seem to be negated the same.
A. None of the mercury introduced into the body can be eliminated.
Negated: some of the mercury introduced ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
PT60.S3.Q10 - A ring of gas emitting X-rays flickeringhttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/ I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-60-section-3-question-10/
I got this one right almost instinctively (I didn't map this out), but I have a question about the phrase "**_can best be explained if_**" in the second sentence of the ...
