HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt61 | 68 | 81 |
| s4 | 1K | 1.3K |
-
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... the explanation video of PT35.S4.Q11, J.Y. explains this ... -
Weird Games (virus game etc.)I am SUPER concerned about getting a weird game on the sep LSAT. I have the "miscellaneous" cambridge packet with all of the weird games but each is …
... />
Difficulty 2
PT6-S4-G3: 10:26
PT20 ... -G4: 17:21
PT6-S4-G4: 10:44
PT15 ... -S4-G2: 13:52
PT11- ... -
Miscellaneous GamesHey everyone, So I'm in the final stretch of studying for my second LSAT in September. I've been doing really well, but want to polish my miscella…
... /> PT4-S3-G4
PT6-S4-G4
PT8-S2-G2 ... -S3-G4
PT6-S4-G3
PT6-S4-G3
PT10 ... /> PT13-S1-G4
PT15-S4-G2
PT16-S1-G4 ... -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneHey everyone, So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61. This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand h…
... question, but I just did PT61 and was stumped on it ... -
PT7.S1.Q10 - a large group of hyperactive childrenI'd love an explanation on this one! Thanks in advance
... as "the Dramamine question"), PT25.S4.Q24, PT55.S3.Q9, PT57 ... -
Misc GamesHi everyone,I was wondering if anybody had any strategies on how to study misc or really weird/one of a kind type games? As an example consider G…
... /> PT1-S2-G1
PT6-S4-G3
PT20-S3-G4 ... -S1-G4
PT6-S4-G4
PT15-S4-G2
PT11 ... -
Misc GamesHi everyone,I was wondering if anybody had any strategies on how to study misc or really weird/one of a kind type games? As an example consider G…
... -S2-G1
> PT6-S4-G3
> PT20-S3 ...
> PT6-S4-G4
> PT15-S4-G2
> ... -
Translation of "derive solely from"I have a question regarding a logical translation of "derive solely from." This is from the answer choice (D) in PT62.S4.Q15. https://7sage.com/lsat_…
... @LSATcantwin !
But PT62.S4.Q15 is a PSA question ... -
PT22.S4.Q19 - contemporary business firmsI could not find anything to prove the conclusion > few people understand current events> and did not see the flaw the LSAT makers identified. He…
Hey, I think you mis-numbered the question. PT22, S4, Q19 is a weakening question on the Iron Law of Responsibility.
Could you provide us with the right question number so we could help you out? -
Weakening questions - a strategy for harder questions?Yesterday I had the privilege of working through a problem with J.Y. It’s in here if you are curious; https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/1…
... get further clarification for PT82.S4.Q14 ?
I've been ... -
DeleteDelete
... of one another (i.e. S4, Q3). When you have a ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... />
J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... /> > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Confusing Bi-Conditional vs. Not Both in LGHi all, I saw a 7sager already posted a similar question (see https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13716), but I'm less confused about what h…
... ; > J.Y. treated PT24 S4 Game 1 (https://7sage.com ... -
Referential phrase: "otherwise"<center>:warning: <font color="red">**This post contains spoilers to PT80.S4.Q15**</font> :warning:</center> I had trouble parsing out the stimulu…
... in LG; for example, PT55.S4.Game 4's last rule ... -
RedactedRedacted
... involved flawed reasoning (e.g. S4.LR1) and were justified as ... -
Complaint/Critique: Inconsistent LG approachesThere are some situations where JY takes a different approach to a rule for no ostensible reason other than the fact that the ordinary approach would…
... games that I pointed out -- PT61 and PT 52 Game 2 ... -
LR: You will choose to buy something vs. You will buy somethingHi 7sagers, Is there a difference in the meaning of the statements below? If you see the desk, you will choose to buy the desk. If you see the…
... in the stimulus of PT18/S4/Q7. The last sentence is ... -
PT75.S4.Q21 (G4)I don't understand how E can be the correct answer. There actually appears to be no correct answer. The LSAT relies heavily on Formal Logic and apply…
... page.
For PT75.S4.Q21 (G4), the [explanation page ... -
How to go back to curriculumI recently watched the "Post CC Strategies" webinar and something that he had mentioned as apart of the first phase of taking PTs is that we should b…
... all the questions in PT44.S4 (Starting from Q1) and PT49 ... .S4 (Starting from Q1).
: ...
