I watched the video explanation for this, but I don't think I understood it 100%.
I think the author's logic is simplified as farther=brighter=younger but I don't quite understand how a brighter star is supposed to be younger. Is this ...
Wow, I did everything on this question and got sucked into answer choice E but had no idea to interpret the word "that" the way JY explained it. Are there others words that indicate "and" or sufficiency that are worth knowing?
http://7sage.com/ ...
I feel like i am almost there with S.A. questions.
Thank you J.Y.!
But I had some major problems diagraming the conclusion of this question.
Can someone ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-26-section-2-question-20/
Can anyone explain this question to me? If you could first point out and explain what the flaw in the stimulus is and then match that against the correct answer, I would greatly ...
I found this question especially tricky because of what I perceive to be a logic gap in the stimulus. The critics argument can be boiled down to (Justified public funding) -& ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-62-section-2-question-13/
I am making a spread sheet of the questions that I got wrong in this section and I am needing some help. Can someone please help me I am stuck. I am re-writing the question stem in a ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-2-question-20/
Hello guys, this MBT question actually comes from the MBT course video. Most people have the question about the last sentence "even its critics acknowledge." I have read all the ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-20/
B is the answer, and the only reason I did not choose it is because it required me to make an assumption that 1. Plankton are not fish (which would require some background knowledge ...
I think I misinterpretted "addressing" in option A to mean that "referring to the..." Instead, by "address" I now think he means "considering and potentially implementing the critics claims doesn't matter yet cause now ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-20/
Can someone break this down? I thought B was the least attractive answer, and it turned out to be correct. I am completely clueless on this one; I can't even make heads or tails of ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-22-section-2-question-20/
I got this one correct by POE, but I am having a lot of trouble explicitly understanding why E is correct (I was wishy washy with A, but I get why it's wrong). Here is my analysis:< ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
Hi everyone! If anyone has some better insight as to why (E) is the correct answer I would greatly appreciate it! I see why (E) would be the right answer but I also believe (C) could be a correct answer. The only issue with (C) that I do see is possibly ...
I did not understand how and why he figured out which parts of the sentences he could use to make conditional statements from the video. He did not use conditional logic for the first sentence even though it had key words "not" and "are".
I'm confused how to write the conditional logic for this. Can somebody please explain this? When I see how the video skipped over labeling the first sentence like a premise, I got confused why he then uses it in conditional logic (TMU---> IASC)? I also ...
When writing out the conditional logic for the reporter, I initially got /C--> /M but when I went back to review I got C---> M. In other words, because of the if I kept ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-20/
Why exactly are C and E incorrect? After mulling over this question for nearly half an hour I can't seem to figure it out.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-67-section-2-question-20/
I am having a lot of trouble seeing how C and D are not saying the same exact thing. Here is how I broke down the structure of the argument.