HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt63 | 62 | 72 |
| s2 | 1.1K | 1.6K |
| q11 | 168 | 180 |
-
Parallel method of reasoning woesHey guys! I'm finding that I'm still having trouble really intuitively knowing when my job in Parallel Method of Reasoning q's is to mirror the lawg…
... of answer choice. (Ie. PT17.s2.q24 from Problem Set 3 ... -
PT20.S2.P4 (Q26) - in the dynamics of apocalypseHey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone coul…
Hey everyone! Having a bit of difficulty with this passage. It's from the first RC problem set in the core curriculum. I was wondering if anyone could add to JY's explanation for #26 and explain how (E) is supported? I chose (A), but I felt uneasy about ... -
PT13.S2.Q7 - It is not correct that people of the USHey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "…
Hey, yall! Would you say that AC B equals ambiguity? Sometimes I get equivocation and ambiguity mixed up but I eliminated equivocation here because "tax" isn't used differently throughout the passages. B basically says the author extended the meaning of ... -
PT73.S2.Q20Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D. The stem is that the argument relies on the assum…
Hi guys! I wanted to get some clarification on the logic that makes this answer E rather than D.
The stem is that the argument relies on the assumption, but my current understanding is that neither answer accomplishes this, though E has more ... -
PT June 2007.S2.Q22 - editorialist: news mediaSharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using…
Sharing this because while eliminating AC E, I was forced to question the difference between causation and sufficiency as well as the danger of using Lawgic as shorthand when you're not actually dealing with conditional statements.
Most ... -
PT68.S2.Q15 - psychologists recently conductedHi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me. The …
Hi, I BR-ed this question, read the explanations from various websites and sources, and this question is still not making much sense to me.
The correct choice D has "probably" in it, which when negated is "not likely." Doesn't "not likely" ... -
PT66 RC .... major score dropI took PT 66 RC a week ago and got -16. Without BRing for it I retook it just now and ended up with -13. Not much difference! I had to skip the last …
... -7 (PT65), -5(PT64), -9 (PT63) but WTH went wrong with ... -
PT15.S2.Q17 - Most people believe that yawningHi, I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain wh…
Hi,
I understand that answer choice D is correct, but I have been struggling for quite a bit on eliminating answer choice B. Can anyone explain why this is incorrect?
When I was doing this question, I noticed two errors in ... -
PT9.S2.Q23 - a poor farmer was fond ofThe negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class?
The negation of poor is not poor. The question assumes that you are either rich or else poor. What about the middle class? -
PT61.S2.Q24 - historian: it is unlikely that someoneHey everyone, So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61. This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand h…
Hey everyone,
So question 24 in section 2 of Prep Test 61.
This question I've been trying to grapple with for 3 days (seriously). I understand how conditionals work, but this question just doesn't work for me no matter how many times ... -
PT55.S2.P2(Q09) & PT55.S2.P4(Q23)Hi all, Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind! In the second p…
Hi all,
Having trouble with 2 questions in pretest 55, and I'd love to get some further explanation if anyone would be so kind!
In the second passage(s) in RC, for question #9, I chose C. Is this wrong because of the "most"; I ... -
PT19.S2.Q18 - in the past decadeCan someone please breakdown this question for me?? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/
Can someone please breakdown this question for me??
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-18/ -
"Even If" Statement in Conjunction with ConditionalHi All, Let's say we have the conditional statement "If I go to the market and go to the mall, then I will reward myself with ice cream." Then …
... point of reference, PT71.S3.Q11 is what prompted this consideration ... -
PT21.S2.Q19 - spectroscopic analysis has revealed - super hard NA q.Hello, This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard. I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be…
Hello,
This is an NA question that I have been trying to grasp. It's REALLY hard.
I will explain how I can justify the to myself and I would be so grateful if anyone wants to chime in and add any additional analysis.
< ... -
"if all and only those" -- biconditional?Hello, I was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression "if all and only those", and it seemed to me as a biconditional indicator, bu…
... was working on PT35.S4.Q11, and came across the expression ... -
PT3.S2.Q25 - the public in the united statesI can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts? Flaw Argument Summary: Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a …
I can't see why E is a better AC that D. Any thoughts?
Flaw
Argument Summary:
Context: The presence of X has conditioned the US to support a substantial defense budget.
Premise 1: X is gone.
Conclusion: ... -
PT63 RCIs it me or is the RC section of this exam extremely difficult. I took a 5 section exam and this was the 5th section of the exam, half way through it…
Is it me or is the RC section of this exam extremely difficult. I took a 5 section exam and this was the 5th section of the exam, half way through it I felt like my brain was about to shut down. I pretty much gave up going into the 4th passage of the ... -
PT12.S2.Q7 (G2) - five childrenSo I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so sh…
So I didn't do so well on this game because I played the children multiple times because it didn't say that they had to be played exactly once, so should we assume that they need to be played at least once unless stated otherwise? Thank you!!! -
PT44.S2.Q20 - research indicatesSo i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/l…
So i see why AC (B) demolishes the argument and is clearly the correct AC. But does AC (A) weaken it as well?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-2-question-20/ -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claimI eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if…
I eliminated answer choice D because it says, "fails to exclude...." As I see it, answer choice D would perfectly address the flaw in the argument if it said something like, "excludes the possibility..." or "fails to consider the possibility...." Am I ... -
PT72.S2.Q16 - many great art worksIm in the middle of BRing and i like AC E bc how does the author know that having so much artwork that can satisfy every taste imaginable will affect…
Im in the middle of BRing and i like AC E bc how does the author know that having so much artwork that can satisfy every taste imaginable will affect someones aesthetic fulfilment.
But AC D... does the author have to assume there is such a scenario? ... -
PTB.S2.G2 - a park contains at most five of sevenI need some clarification on this because I'm applying demorgan's law and it's not making sense to me how this works. So, the final rule in the ga…
I need some clarification on this because I'm applying demorgan's law and it's not making sense to me how this works.
So, the final rule in the game states: "If it is not the case that the park contains both laurels and oaks, then it ... -
SA drills? Help with old (basically ancient) PT'sHey guys, i'm using the cambridge drills to practice SA questions, I'm wondering if someone has access to them and could help me out? It's questi…
PT50.S2.Q19 - fat is generally unhealthy(P1) Get your nutrients from natural foods and not supplements. (P2) Carrots give you beta carotene but it can only be transformed into Vitamin A …
(P1) Get your nutrients from natural foods and not supplements.
(P2) Carrots give you beta carotene but it can only be transformed into Vitamin A if you eat them with some fat.
(P3) Fat in one's diet is generally unhealthy.< ...PT34.S2.Q18 - editorialist: the positions advancedI got the MP but I wanted to further analyze... Could someone review my thought process please? (This is a question in CC!) Part of the stimulus: …
I got the MP but I wanted to further analyze... Could someone review my thought process please? (This is a question in CC!)
Part of the stimulus: "But there is a positive role to be played even by these extremists for the social & ...PT64.S2.G4 - exactly eight booksDid anyone find a more simpler way to tackle game 4 in this pt? https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-2-game-4/
Did anyone find a more simpler way to tackle game 4 in this pt?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-64-section-2-game-4/PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claim that shakespeareCan anybody tell me what this answer choice is exactly saying? I just want to know what it's trying to say because I don't think I'm completely under…
Can anybody tell me what this answer choice is exactly saying? I just want to know what it's trying to say because I don't think I'm completely understanding it.
It was a flaw in reasoning question (Preptest December 2015, Section 2, LR, ...PT58.S2.P3 - law and tangible object theoryOne of the RC passages in Sept. 2009 was about copyright and tangible object theory (TOT). In general, the passage goes like this (working from memor…
One of the RC passages in Sept. 2009 was about copyright and tangible object theory (TOT). In general, the passage goes like this (working from memory here since it's not with me at the moment but it's been bothering me all day):
P1 - Intro ...PT73.S2.Q12 - the chairperson should notI am trying to find a good explanation for answer choice A (correct) over answer choice D (incorrect) on PT.73 LR #1 , Q12. The stimulus states t…
I am trying to find a good explanation for answer choice A (correct) over answer choice D (incorrect) on PT.73 LR #1 , Q12.
The stimulus states that the chairperson should not have released the report because they did not consult any other ...
