http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-71-section-1-question-03/
Had trouble understanding what "on balance" meant here. I interpreted it as "in moderation" so, to me, the conclusion was alcohol consumption, in moderation, is beneficial. Could ...
Hi, I understand why the answer choice (D) is correct, but I have a question on (B).
The stimulus states that since "faculty salaries constitute a small part of the university's expenditure," the administration's explanation is not believable.
I really don't understand why D is incorrect and B has to be an answer.
Some explanations said D is too broad, but I don't see how it's too broad.
I think "in the same industry" can match fax industry so that I think D is correct.
Why ...
So where is the key piece of evidence that I should really focus on in this question? The conditional is throwing me off.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-10/
I think the error that author makes is false equation (population # = # of library users) but can someone explain answers (B) and (E) in further detail? Thanks in advance! :)
Blind reviewing the aforementioned Prep Test and having trouble with PT.63.S.1.Q.10. I almost never have these kinds of very basic questions below (i.e., what exactly is the conclusion?) But bear with me, I found this problem sneaky ...
Please offer your help with this question! Apologies for a long post.
We know that snowy land reflects MORE sunlight.
That means snowy land absorbs LESS sunlight. We dont know what effect this ABSORPTION has on earths overall ...
#help
Question 10: How do we know that "additives" was ever the cause of behavioral problems in the first place? Researchers being "trained to assess the presence or absence of behavioral problems" does not mean whatever behavioral problems are ...
I understand the whole formal logic chain, pretty simple, however I do not understand why the last sentence is added to the end of the chain (a necessary condition) when the sentence starts out as 'The only', which implies sufficiency. Not sure for legal ...
I couldn't see how the term "normal" was used differently between the two speakers? Would someone be able to clarify how to focus on that? I completely brushed over that.
I ultimately chose A, but really struggle to eliminate B--which turned out to be correct. However, I am having trouble understanding why B is a better answer? Thanks in advance.
As the header states, I didn't see any blatantly wrong with the argument. It was just a causal chain (Global warming causes temperatures to increase which causes greater proportion of precipitation to fall as rain which causes faster melting and more ...
A is completely irrelevant and argument doesnt make that assumption
I chose B but its wrong since argument says that fertilizer use will be reduced, it doesnt say we dont have to use fertlizers anymore. If it had said that we dont need fertilizer ...