https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-4-question-09/
I've spent about 2 hrs dissecting this question and I just DO NOT understand it. At all. I've looked at discussion boards, books, everything. Please, for the love of God, HELP!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-4-question-20/
Could someone please explain why answer A is correct. I can get there by process of elimination as I understand fully why the other answers are incorrect. But I'd really like to ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-4-game-4/
I have a question about one of the rules...the rule says "S CAN be earlier than Q only if Q is third." I thought it is different from saying "S IS earlier than Q only if Q is third" so I ...
Im having problems eliminating answer A for this question. Can anyone explain why it is wrong?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-22
I was watching J.Y explanation for PT 68 Game 2 and he mentions that the stimulus allows for one day to be empty, and later on using the rules he infers that none of the days will be empty. But during the time section when I was reading the stimulus I ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-24-section-4-game-4/
Hi guys, I got a problem with translation of last rule of Game 4 of PT 24.It would be great if someone could help me and explain my error to me?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-68-section-4-game-4
someone said we can make it a double layer sequencing game representing the type of article (finance, nutrition, and wildlife) on the top row....what would the game board look like? could ...
I was not sure between C and D.
I thought D could be true because maybe they favored a certain character more than the other charactors. This would explain why the abridgement contains a very accurate rendering of the speeches of one of the ...
I did not like any choices in this question at first...am I only the one who feel PT 61's LR is kind of different/harder??
Anyway,
In the principle it does not say it should hire a candidate who would be fully qualified when none of the fully ...
Quick question about the above referenced problem. Why is (C) correct, and (B) wrong? I personally disliked (C) because of the word "remain". Stimulus is talking about "being" free (and "becoming" free), not about "remaining".
< ...
So, I got this question right and I understand why the correct answer is correct and the others are wrong, but I need a little help figuring out C. Is it wrong because of the word only?
A) Murray never states his opinion on this, he just ...
Question about this question and the answers, particularly C and D. The question is a resolve the paradox in which we are told that auto safety experts are concerned about the "increasing popularity" of SUV vehicles, after being told that they are "safer" ...
The answer choices really messed with me because I was between c and d. C plays with the negatives a lot. C says: NONE of the shows that Wilke and Wilke produced last year that ...
It says "rock music has nothing going for it" but even if A is true...can't LP still have value if they accompany visual art? Since visual art itself provides some value...
I'm confused with this question :(
I've watched JY's explanation of this video and I'm beginning to see why E could be a correct answer...but I do not understand why it is THE correct answer. I fear that if I was asked this question again, I would still choose B.
So this question is asking for the answer choice that would most strongly support the Development Commissioner's position. I cannot see how C is the correct answer. In order to chose C, we have to make the assumption that the ...
I spend a couple of hours to figure out the structure/what's the author's position but I still do not understand it...
So he is disagreeing with Taruskin right?
What are exactly their arguments? What is the position of the "artists"? Do they ...
I'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in advance!