I can understand how ACs A-D are incorrect. I am truly struggling to see how E is correct.
My contention here is that even if a greater proportion of crimes are reported in recent years, those independent surveys would still include all of ...
I got the answer right by confidently eliminating all the others.
I am still confused about the correct answer choice. The first sentence in the stimulus implies that more than .5 grams have the capacity to neutralize.. Not .5 grams. ...
I chose E and was very confident about it on both timed run and BR. My reasoning was, the first premise is talking about "legislation," and the conclusion is about a "trade agreement." I thought it was super vague whether a trade agreement should be ...
I understand why D is correct, but can someone give an example of what C looks like in an argument? How would you be able to determine whether the evidence given is "stronger" than what the conclusion requires?
Just a friendly reminder to read every single word throughout the stimulus and the answer choices. I blind reviewed this question for FAR too long and ended up not really seeing a clear difference between any of the answer choices. When something is not ...
I originally put A, I now understand why A is wrong. But I don't really understand why D is the right answer choice and what it means by "supposed class allegiance"
Hello! If anyone could clarify where I’m misunderstanding, I would be so grateful!
So the diagram for this is: (B - banker, A - athlete, L - lawyer)
B —> A
L—> /B (the contrapositive would be B —> /L)
—
So you ...
... aren't unprecedented. Take PT76 S2 Q18, for example. There is ... ol' hatha yoga question (PT37 S2Q19). Not quite the same question ... type and format, but S2 Q22 is kind of similar ...