... .Y.'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR, I noticed ... .Y.'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR: https://7sage ... .com/lesson/preptest-81-s2-lr-live-commentary/
... .Y.'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR, I noticed ... .Y.'s live commentary for PT81 section 2 LR: https://7sage ... .com/lesson/preptest-81-s2-lr-live-commentary/
Sharing afew LR problems with conditional language I'd saved over the past few months:
PT09 S2 Q13
PT51 S1 Q21
PT51 S3 Q14
PT51 S3 Q19
PT60 S3 Q12
PT71 S3 Q11
PT71 S3 Q17
This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?
Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2 Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes...
I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and wanted more practice, so I returned to the June 2007 Practice Test. As I went through Section 2, I ...