This resolve the paradox... just not understanding it in the least. Any help will be much appreciated.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-14/
What is the difference between making the premises less supportive of the conclusion and attacking the premises? Wouldn’t attacking the premises reduce the support that the conclusion receives?
... correctly answer sample logical reasoning/weakening the argument type questions. Unfortunately ... correct answer to logical reasoning/weakening the argument type questions.
In approaching those "most vulnerable to criticism" question, do you guys think I can treat it as a weakening question and if the AC is correct, it will weaken the argument? Any other suggestion to solve this type?