I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't find that lesson anywhere and am not sure if I just made that rule up in my head. Is this lawgic logical?
... don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B ... /how to use this new rule in context with a question ... on the LSAT. Is the rule just referring to when you ... it, is by using that rule. Like I don't see ...
For the life of me, I cannot understand the level 5 difficulty questions for PSA. I can get the lower and medium difficulty questions correct, but it seems like the higher difficulty just isn't clicking. Does anyone have any tips or ...
... . I understand the idea of "rule and application", and I know ... should be looking for a rule where the premises in the ... stimulus triggers the rule, but I keep getting it ...
... recognize anything then apply each rule one by one. After you ... if you've exhausted every rule the rest are simply free ... />
If your getting the rule replacement questions on the recent ...
... might see in other given rule that C - D - A. Now ... you know that for this rule to hold, you can't ... or after D; and another rule that B - C. Now you ...
One more question, as to the game you created, my first reaction is to get rid of B, because B hates two others; In fact, I always tend to get rid of the one that contradicts the most number of others. Could that be a rule of thumb?