HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| third | 2K | 2.3K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
-
Official June LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official June LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the June 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Does anyone who had two LG sections remember if the experimental was the first section or third section, or might it be changed up for different people? I think the nerves from the test are making me blend sections together at this point. -
Official December LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official December LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the December 2016 LSAT here! Here's some ground rule…
... my worst section, but I mostly figured out the third one about ... game and two on the third game and the entire fourth ... felt like the second one (third section) was insanely easy. Had 5 ... -
Anyone else feel like they could have scored either a 140 or a 170?I am not going to lie, I could see it going either way. I went with my first choice every single time, without making sure that it wasn't a trap answ…
... ), I felt pretty good about section 2 (LR). Then, they hit ... I'm not mistaken, my third section/second RC was the experimental ... I hope it was! 4th section (LR) didn't go so ... -
Anyone else feel like they could have scored either a 140 or a 170?I am not going to lie, I could see it going either way. I went with my first choice every single time, without making sure that it wasn't a trap answ…
@MrSamIam said:
my third section/second RC was the experimental...at least I hope it was!
The Rawls passage was the real one. I only had 1 RC. -
Official June LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official June LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the June 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I finished the logic games section with 7 minutes remaining and ... adrenaline going so that first section of LR really got ... to have been the experimental section. I feel pretty good ... sentence was contradictory. Then the third section, LR, I felt pretty good ... -
Official June LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official June LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the June 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... I finished the logic games section with 7 minutes remaining and ... adrenaline going so that first section of LR really got ... to have been the experimental section. I feel pretty good ... sentence was contradictory. Then the third section, LR, I felt pretty good ... -
Overwhelmed (advice needed particularly from those that work Full-Time)Hi everyone, I hope everyone had a great weekend. I wanted to post to get some advice from all of you, especially those who have managed studying…
... with an option for a third section if possible is probably best ... do a minimum of one section per day, you'll still ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Yea also had beads and gold with the homophones as the third section with 26 questions. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone? -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR ... same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR ... same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR ... same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR ... same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR ... same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... remember from the second LG (third section overall) was that the first ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... remember from the second LG (third section overall) was that the first ... . I only had 1 LG section. -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; I only had one LG section, and it was East/West ... and away the easiest LG section I've come across, to ... thought that the second LG (third section) was easier. Also, do you ... four in the real section -- the only LG section you had? I ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; I only had one LG section, and it was East/West ... and away the easiest LG section I've come across, to ... thought that the second LG (third section) was easier. Also, do you ... four in the real section -- the only LG section you had? I ... -
Consistency in the 170sMy PTs have been ranging between 168-173. Does anyone have any advice on how and what helped them to push into the 175+ range?
... energy higher, especially on the third section. Maybe I should start PTing ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR ...
Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... policy was in my first section which is why I know ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR ... ;
> Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... policy was in my first section which is why I know ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over all ... -
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR ... /> > > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... policy was in my first section which is why I know ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ... all section of the test
Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... if the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the LR ... ; > > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... policy was in my first section which is why I know ... been in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over all ... section of the test
> ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the ... gt; > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... was in my first section which is why I ... in the 2nd LR section, and the 3rd over ...
That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the ... > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... was in my first section which is why I ... ;
> That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... /> Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the ... ; > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... /> > > That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... ; Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm ... or two per LR section and mistake per RC ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the ... ; > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... gt; > > That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm ... or two per LR section and mistake per RC ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... the 1st or 3rd section was experimental on the ... ; > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... ; > > That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... ; Same...between that LR section and the RC I'm ... or two per LR section and mistake per RC ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... ; > > > That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per RC passage ... watch out for the comparative section :-P
Exactly! I ...Official September 2017 LSAT Discussion ThreadHey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here! Here's some ground rules, taken…
... ; > > Mine was the third section, but I'm not sure ... ; > > > That first section was definitely difficult. Was debating ... mistake or two per LR section and mistake per RC passage ... watch out for the comparative section :-P
>
> ...
