So, I'm currently completing the sufficientassumption section of the CC, and I have a question about diagramming. When I'm currently doing the practice problems and problem sets, I find that I am most successful (95% and
SufficientAssumption Intensive with Sage Jimmy Dahroug ... recording or broadcasting of webinars is strictly prohibited (Periscope, screencapture, etc ... LSAC's copyright. Copyright infringement is not a good way to ...
Is it always the case that if an argument for a sufficientassumption question ... between the conclusion and premises. Is normative language in the answer ...
So I fell for a sufficientassumption trap, I chose the answer that was basically a restated premise, so for the assumption questions, the answer that is basically a premise, is that always wrong? TYA!
... />
JY explained that sufficientassumption questions are something like: is, are these "fill the gap" kind of questions both sufficientassumption ... and necessary assumption questions at the same ...
... particular Necessary Assumption question, JY said: "This answer choice is great because ... why conditional language is an indicator of a SufficientAssumption correct AC (because ... or language that is "too strong" within Necessary Assumption answer choices.
... for the following SufficientAssumption question.
Every student who walks to ... It follows That some students who have part-time jobs do ... :
a. Some students who do not go home for ... .
b. Every student who does not go home for ...
Guys, so for N.A we have the flip test for the answer to see if the assumptionis necessary or not. Is there something like that for the SufficientAssumption questions?
... a sufficientassumption or if it is up for debate; my answer is that ... interpretation then my stance is that (E) is a sufficientassumption answer choice because ... 3rd interpretation then (E) is also a sufficientassumption answer as well for ...
I am coming to terms that I have serious difficulty with sufficientassumption questions. IS there anyone that can help?
I’ve gone back over my notes but I’m still lost.
When answering necessary assumption questions in LR, how do you not fall for the trap answer choices that provide a sufficientassumption? I am finding that when given a SA answer choice, I will often select it.
I really struggle with sufficientassumption questions. Can someone please offer some guidance/tips/tricks on how to start understanding them and getting them correct?
... get that every NA is an assumption the argument actually makes. Why ... making that assumption. But is the inverse also true? Is every assumption the argument ... seems to affirm every assumption argument actually makes is a NA.