LSAT 11 – Section 4 – Question 18

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 1:34

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView
Type Tags Answer
Choices
Curve Question
Difficulty
Psg/Game/S
Difficulty
Explanation
PT11 S4 Q18
+LR
Strengthen +Streng
A
67%
166
B
5%
158
C
11%
161
D
13%
160
E
5%
160
144
156
168
+Harder 149.098 +SubsectionMedium
This page shows a recording of a live class. We're working hard to create our standard, concise explanation videos for the questions in this PrepTest. Thank you for your patience!

We should recognize this as a strengthening question, since the stem states: Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the teacher’s argument?

Our stimulus takes the form of a dialogue between a student and teacher, and we are tasked with strengthening the teacher’s argument.

The teacher argues that journalists who don’t disclose the identity of their source stake their reputation on the ‘logic of anecdotes’. Basically, you judge their reporting, and consequently their reputation, on a similar basis to how you judge an anecdote. He supports this claim with some more specific information comparing anonymously sourced reports and anecdotes. It is necessary for an anonymous report to be published, and an anecdote to be good, that they be highly plausible, original, or interesting. The student responds by saying that if this were true, journalists wouldn’t need actual sources, since it wouldn’t be hard for a resourceful journalist to just invent plausible, original, or interesting stories. We want to support the Teacher’s claim that journalist stake their reputation on the logic of anecdotes when they use anonymous sources. On to the answer choices:

Correct Answer Choice (A) This connects our journalists premise about the requirements to be published with his conclusion about reputation.

Answer Choice (B) Our teacher’s argument is about anonymous sources; this isn’t relevant.

Answer Choice (C) This wouldn’t affect whether they get published, and hence whether the journalist stakes his reputation.

Answer Choice (D) This does nothing for us.

Answer Choice (E) We are interested in their reputation, and whether they stake it, not whether they are valued by their publishers.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

Leave a Reply