LSAT 129 – Section 2 – Question 13
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:14
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT129 S2 Q13 |
+LR
| Argument part +AP Net Effect +NetEff | A
5%
163
B
6%
160
C
83%
165
D
5%
160
E
1%
154
|
121 138 155 |
+Easier | 144.702 +SubsectionEasier |
Summarize Argument: Counter-Position
While some administrators believe that computers will enable schools to teach far more courses with fewer teachers, this belief is mistaken. Computerized instruction actually requires more time from teachers. This indicates that reducing the amount of teachers would also reduce the number of courses offered.
Identify Argument Part
This is a claim that the argument sets out to refute.
A
It is presented as a possible explanation for an observation that follows it.
The purpose of this claim is not to explain the following sentence. The claim is mentioned because the rest of the argument is designed to refute this statement.
B
It is a statement of the problem the argument sets out to solve.
The argument does not seek to “solve” this problem; it is focused on correcting a misconception. This statement is a belief that the argument disputes.
C
It is a statement that the argument is designed to refute.
The argument’s purpose is to refute this claim. The author directly challenges this belief by claiming that computerizing education would have the opposite effect.
D
It is a statement offered in support of the argument’s main conclusion.
This statement does not support the main conclusion. The main conclusion is directly opposed to this belief.
E
It is the argument’s main conclusion.
This is not the main conclusion because it is not supported by any premises. The main conclusion directly contradicts this statement.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 129 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.