LSAT 152 – Section 4 – Question 06

LSAT 152 - Section 4 - Question 06

November 2018

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 1:05

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT152 S4 Q06
+LR
Argument part +AP
A
85%
163
B
3%
154
C
9%
157
D
1%
148
E
2%
152
129
141
153
 +Easier 147.181 +SubsectionMedium

Psychologist: Thinking can occur without language. Researchers have demonstrated that three-month-old infants, who obviously have no knowledge of language, can detect anomalies in pictures—in a picture displaying a human face with three eyes, for example. The infants probably compare this picture with an internal representation of a typical human face. Thus, a thought of a typical human face must exist in the infants’ minds.

Summarize Argument
The Psychologist concludes that thinking can occur without language. Why? Because infants with no knowledge of language can spot irregularities in pictures. To do this, the infants probably compare the picture with an internal representation of what is typical, and so a thought of what is typical must exist in the infants’ minds.

Identify Argument Part
The statement in the last sentence is a sub-conclusion used to support the Psychologist’s main conclusion.

A
It is a conclusion drawn and used in turn as a premise to support a more general conclusion.
The statement is a sub-conclusion used as support for the Psychologist’s general conclusion: thinking can occur without language.
B
It is attributed to certain researchers as the main conclusion of their reasoning.
The statement is not the Psychologist’s main conclusion.
C
It is the main point of the psychologist’s argument.
The statement is not the Psychologist’s main conclusion.
D
It is used to refute the claim that infants have no knowledge of language.
The claim that infants have no knowledge of language is never refuted.
E
It states the hypothesis to be explained by the psychologist’s argument.
The statement is not a hypothesis.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 152 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Reading Comprehension

Section 4 - Logical Reasoning

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply