LSAT 21 – Section 2 – Question 25

LSAT 21 - Section 2 - Question 25

December 1996

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Request new explanation

Target time: 0:41

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT21 S2 Q25
+LR
Flaw or descriptive weakening +Flaw
A
25%
166
B
8%
165
C
9%
164
D
3%
157
E
56%
169
151
165
180
 +Hardest 147.253 +SubsectionMedium

2:39 - Correction
In the video I labeled "no significant aspect can be controlled by a single variable" as the conclusion. An attentive 7Sager pointed out that it's actually the sub-conclusion. It's supported by an appeal to authority premise "any professional meteorologist will tell you that". The main conclusion is "I disagree."

Restructured, the Meteorologist's argument starts with an appeal to authority, supporting a general sub-conclusion, supporting a specific sub-conclusion.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 21 Explanations

Section 1 - Logic Games

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply