Several Tyrannosaurus rex skeletons found in North America contain tooth marks that only a large carnivore could have made. At the time T. rex lived, it was the only large carnivore in North America. The tooth marks could have resulted only from combat or feeding. But such tooth marks would have been almost impossible to inflict on the skeleton of a live animal.

Summary

There are several T. Rex skeletons found in North America with tooth marks that could only have been made by a large carnivore. T. Rex were the only large carnivores in North America when they lived. The tooth marks could only have resulted from combat or feeding. These tooth marks would have been impossible to inflict on the skeleton of a live animal.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

The tooth marks on the T. Rex skeletons are likely a product of other T. Rex’s feeding on T. Rex bodies.

A
T. rex regularly engaged in combat with smaller carnivores.

This is unsupported because we don’t have information about tooth marks being found on the skeletons of other carnivores or any other evidence of such combat.

B
At the time T. rex lived, it was common for carnivores to feed on other carnivores.

This is unsupported because even though T. Rex appears to have fed on other T. Rex, we don’t know that this was common for other carnivores.

C
T. rex sometimes engaged in cannibalism.

This is strongly supported because we know that the marks on the skeletons could only have come from other T. Rex’s, and they could only have been made during feeding on an already dead animal.

D
T. rex sometimes engaged in intraspecies combat.

This is unsupported because the marks on the skeletons could only have been made on already dead animals, which precludes the marks being made during combat.

E
At the time T. rex lived, there were large carnivores on continents other than North America.

This is unsupported because we don’t know anything about the distribution of carnivores across other continents. The stimulus is confined to discussing North America.


9 comments

Until fairly recently, classroom computers were considered a luxury. Today, educators argue that students who have not had training in computer skills will lack the skills necessary to compete in the global marketplace. However, studies show that schools emphasizing computer technology spend more time teaching computer skills but less time developing students’ basic math and reading skills.

Summary
Until recently, classroom computers were considered a luxury. Educators claim that students that have not been taught computer skills will lack necessary skills to compete in the global marketplace. However, studies show that schools that emphasize computer technology spend more time teaching computer skills than basic skills.

Strongly Supported Conclusions
Sometimes keeping up with the requirements for developing new skills can lead to neglect in addressing other skills.

A
A knowledge of the latest technologies is no more valuable than a knowledge of the fundamental academic disciplines.
This answer is unsupported. We don’t know, in direct comparison, what skills are more valuable than others. We know that computer skills are valuable to enable students to compete, but basic knowledge could be more valuable.
B
Schools cannot emphasize the teaching of computer skills without neglecting other skills.
This answer is unsupported. We don’t know if a scenario of balancing the attention between different skills is impossible. We only know that recent studies show that schools are not balancing them.
C
A complete rethinking of traditional academic subjects is required in order to keep pace with global developments.
This answer is unsupported. We don’t know whether a complete rethinking is required.
D
Attempting to keep pace with recent educational developments can result in neglecting basic skills in favor of other skills.
This answer is strongly supported. Studies show that schools are spending less time teaching the basics in favor of teaching computer skills to students.
E
Giving students a knowledge of new technologies should be the primary goal of education.
This answer is unsupported. We don’t know what should be the primary goal of education. The stimulus does not make a value judgment.

18 comments