Flores: The behavior of the character Gawain in Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur fluctuates radically and without apparent reason between heroic and criminal. Malory’s portrayal of Gawain is incoherent in this way because Malory based his book on earlier sources from different eras, and Gawain’s role changed over time.

Piro: While the variation you mention might stem from the different times that Malory’s sources were written, in Malory’s work Gawain’s heroic behavior occurs during crises, but his criminal behavior occurs during stable periods, when there is more room to break the rules.

Speaker 1 Summary

Flores claims that Malory depicts the character Gawain in a way that is incoherent. How so? Because Gawain’s behavior swings randomly between heroic and criminal. Flores further supports this incoherence by explaining that Malory used sources from different time periods, where Gawain’s role was different.

Speaker 2 Summary

Piro’s argument is directed at the implied conclusion that Malory’s depiction of Gawain is not incoherent, despite Malory’s use of different sources. As support, Piro says that Gawain acts heroically during crises but criminally during periods of stability. A narrative explanation for Gawain’s varying behavior makes the depiction more coherent.

Objective

We want to find a point of disagreement between Flores and Piro. They disagree about whether Malory’s depiction of Gawain is incoherent.

A
Malory’s portrayal of the character of Gawain in Le Morte D’Arthur is incoherent

Flores agrees but Piro disagrees, making this the disagreement. Flores’s main conclusion is that Malory’s portrayal of Gawain is incoherent. On the other hand, Piro provides an explanation for Gawain’s behavior, implying that the depiction is coherent.

B
the sources for Malory’s characterization of Gawain were written in different eras

Like (C) and (E), Flores agrees with this and Piro doesn’t express an opinion. Piro acknowledges that this might be true, but doesn’t really commit either way.

C
Gawain was portrayed as a hero in some of the stories that Malory used as sources

Like (B) and (E), Flores agrees, but Piro neither agrees nor disagrees. Flores says that Gawain swings from hero to criminal because of how different sources depicted him, implying that he was sometimes depicted as a hero. Piro is ambivalent about Flores’s claims about sources.

D
the behavior of Gawain in Le Morte D’Arthur alternates between heroic and criminal

Both speakers agree with this. Their disagreement is about whether Gawain’s alternating behavior amounts to an incoherent depiction of the character, or if it instead has a good explanation within the story.

E
the sources for Malory’s characterization of Gawain vary significantly regarding the role played by Gawain

Like (B) and (C), Flores agrees but Piro has no opinion. The only thing Piro says about Malory’s sources is that Flores might be correct: in other words, the sources might vary regarding Gawain’s role. This still leaves open the possibility that the sources don’t actually vary.


2 comments

If you use a wood stove to heat your home, you should use a wood-pellet stove rather than a regular wood stove. Because wood pellets are made from by-products of manufacturing processes that would otherwise go to landfills, heating a home with a wood-pellet stove will not cause more trees to be felled. The same cannot be said for regular wood stoves. So wood-pellet stoves are better for the environment than are regular wood stoves.

Summarize Argument
The main conclusion is that people who use a wood stove to heat their homes should use wood-pellet stoves instead of regular wood stoves. The author bases this on a subsidiary conclusion that wood-pellet stoves are better for the environment than regular wood stoves. The support for this subsidiary conclusion are the claims that wood-pellet stoves don’t cause more trees to be cut down, whereas regular wood stoves will cause more trees to be cut down.

Identify Conclusion
The conclusion is the author’s recommendation about what kind of wood stove to use: “If you use a wood stove to heat your home, you should use a wood-pellet stove rather than a regular wood stove.”

A
Wood pellets are made from waste products of manufacturing processes that would otherwise not be recycled.
This is a premise. The author uses this fact to establish that wood-pellet stoves are better for the environment than regular wood stoves, which in turn supports the author’s recommendation.
B
Heating a home with a wood-pellet stove is better for the environment than is heating a home with a regular wood stove.
This is a subsidiary conclusion. The author uses this to support the recommendation about what kind of wood stove to use.
C
Using a wood-pellet stove to heat one’s home does not cause trees to be felled.
This is part of the author’s support. Because wood-pellet stoves don’t cause more trees to be felled, whereas regular wood stoves do, wood-pellet stoves are better for the environment. This in turn supports the author’s recommendation.
D
Using a regular wood stove to heat one’s home causes trees to be felled.
This is part of the author’s support. Because wood-pellet stoves don’t cause more trees to be felled, whereas regular wood stoves do, wood-pellet stoves are better for the environment. This in turn supports the author’s recommendation.
E
People who use wood stoves to heat their homes should use wood-pellet stoves instead of regular wood stoves.
This is a paraphrase of the first sentence, which is the main conclusion.

4 comments