That Shakespeare’s The Winter’s Tale (1610–1611) is modeled after Euripides’ Alcestis (fifth century B.C.) seems undeniable. However, it is generally accepted that Shakespeare knew little or no Greek, so Euripides’ original play would be an unlikely source. Thus, it seems most likely that Shakespeare came to know Euripides’ play through a Latin translation.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

The author hypothesizes that Shakespeare probably learned about Euripedes’ play through a Latin translation. This is based on the fact that Shakespeare knew little or no Greek, which suggests he didn’t read the original version of Euripedes’ play.

Notable Assumptions

The author assumes that Shakespeare didn’t learn about the play through a translation in another language, such as English. The author also assumes that Shakespeare learned about Euripedes’ play through a translation, as opposed to learning about the play through a conversation or through other kinds of communiation with people who knew about the play. The author also assumes that Shakespeare could read Latin.

A
Latin phrases that were widely used in England during Shakespeare’s time appear in a number of his plays.

This doesn’t suggest that Shakespeare knew Latin. If the phrases were widely used, that suggests he may have simply used phrases that came to be part of general parlance. (Think about a phrase like “schadenfreude” - you may know what this means without knowing German.)

B
The only English language version of Alcestis available in Shakespeare’s time differed drastically from the original in ways The Winter’s Tale does not.

This provides evidence against the theory that Shakespeare learned about Euripedes’ play through an English translation.

C
Paul Buchanan’s 1539 Latin translation of Alcestis was faithful to the original and widely available during the 1600s.

This strengthens by affirming that there was in fact a Latin translation of Euripedes’ play in existence at the time Shakespeare wrote The Winter’s Tale.

D
Shakespeare’s father’s community standing makes it probable that Shakespeare attended grammar school, where Latin would have been a mandatory subject.

This strengthens by providing evidence that Shakespeare knew Latin.

E
There is strong evidence to suggest that Shakespeare relied on Latin translations of Greek plays as sources for some of his other works.

This strengthens by showing that there is precedent for the idea that Shakespeare was influenced by Latin translations of Greek plays.


52 comments

In the winter, ravens survive by eating carcasses; in fact, an individual raven may survive for weeks on one carcass. Yet, according to many reports, ravens will often recruit more ravens to help eat a carcass. This seemingly altruistic behavior struck Bernd Heinrich as being worthy of investigation. He set up observation blinds from which he had a clear view of an open meadow in which he placed meat. He found that the mated pair of ravens in whose territory the meadow was located laid exclusive claim to the meat; so, to avoid starvation, juvenile ravens—who do not yet have territories—had to assemble in groups large enough to drive the resident pair away from the meat.

There were many reports that ravens often recruit more ravens to help eat a carcass. This is counterintuitive, because it seems strange that a raven would be altruistic. Heinrich investigated this phenomenon. He observed a meadow where a mated pair of ravens laid exclusive claim to meat placed by Heinrich. Juvenile ravens had to group up to drive the mated pair away from the meat. (The implication is that ravens might share a carcass not out of altruism, but out of self-interest. The ravens might need to group up in order to access food.)

Describe Method of Reasoning
Heinrich investigated reports of ravens sharing a carcass. He found that this phenomenon might be due to juvenile ravens needing to group up to help get access to food.

A
He proposed two alternative hypotheses, each of which would explain a set of observations.
Heinrich did not propose any hypotheses. We only get a description of his experiment and the results.
B
His investigation partially confirmed prior observations but led to a radical reinterpretation of those observations.
His investigation confirmed prior observations (ravens indeed recruit others), but led to a radical reinterpretation (the reason ravens recruit others is not altruism, but self-interest; they need to group up to help access food belonging to older ravens).
C
He proposed a theory and then proceeded to confirm it through observation.
We don’t get any theory proposed by Heinrich. If you consider “altruism” to be Heinrich’s theory, then (C) is wrong because Heinrich did not confirm that the ravens were altruistic.
D
He used different methods from those used in earlier studies but arrived at the same conclusion.
We do not know what kinds of methods were used in earlier studies, or whether there were earlier studies. So we don’t know Heinrich used different methods.
E
His investigation replicated previous studies but yielded a more limited set of observational data.
We do not know whether there were previous studies or anything about the observational data in those studies. So we don’t know whether Heinrich replicated any studies or had a more limited set of data.

7 comments

Although early jazz music featured a great deal of improvisation, this improvisation did not stray too far from the rather simple, catchy melodies upon which it was based. So, however interesting it may be, later music featuring improvisation that strays far from the melody ought not to be classified as jazz.

Summarize Argument
The author concludes that later music featuring improvisation that strays far from the melody should not be classified as jazz. This is because early jazz’s improvisation did not stray far from the melodies.

Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that straying far from the melody is a determining factor in whether something should be classified as jazz. (This overlooks the possibility that there may be other features about the later music that should justify classifying it as jazz.)

A
For a piece of music to be classified as jazz, it must feature some amount of improvisation.
The author never suggested that jazz cannot have improvisation. The issue is whether that improvisation strays far from the melody. The author thinks if it does, it shouldn’t be classified as jazz.
B
The later music featuring improvisation was heavily influenced by early jazz.
The author never suggested that the later music wasn’t heavily influenced by jazz. What the author cares about is the level of improvisation. We want to weaken the author’s assumption that straying far from the melody should prevent a music from being jazz.
C
Some of the later music featuring improvisation was performed by artists who had been jazz musicians earlier in their careers.
The identity of the performers has no clear impact on whether music should be classified as jazz. Jazz musicians can perform non-jazz music.
D
Many types of music other than jazz feature a great deal of improvisation.
The author never assumed that only jazz contains improvisation. The issue is whether straying far from the melody should prevent a music from being classified as jazz.
E
The later music featuring improvisation has much more in common with early jazz than with any other type of music.
This suggests that if we are to classify the music based on similarities/differences, there’s no more reasonable option than classifying it as jazz. Other types of music are more different than early jazz is, even if the later music’s improvisation strays further from the melody.

37 comments