Book collector: The demand for out-of-print books is increasing. It has been spurred by the rise of the Internet, the search capabilities of which make it much easier to locate the out-of-print books one seeks.

Summary

The book collector says that there’s an increasing demand for out-of-print books. The Internet contributes to this demand by allowing people to locate the out-of-print books they want.

Strongly Supported Conclusions

Based on these facts, we can infer that being able to locate out-of-print books leads to a greater demand for those books.

A
Book collectors are now using the Internet to find book titles that they previously did not know existed.

This is not supported. The book collector is only talking about people being able to track down the out-of-print books they already want. We don’t know about identifying new books.

B
Fewer people try to find books that are in print than try to find books that are out of print.

This is not supported. The book collector never refers to people trying to find books that are in print, so we can’t compare with people who try to find out-of-print books.

C
The amount of demand for out-of-print books is affected by the ease of finding such books.

This is strongly supported. In order for Internet search capabilities to increase the demand for out-of-print books, it must be the case that being able to more easily find these book increases the demand for them. And increasing demand definitely means affecting demand!

D
The Internet’s search capabilities make it possible to locate most out-of-print books.

This is not supported. All we know is that the Internet makes it easier to locate out-of-print books. We still don’t know how many of those books can actually be found, just that it’s more than would be found without the Internet.

E
Only people who have access to the Internet can locate out-of-print books.

This is not supported. The book collector only says that the Internet makes it easier to locate out-of-print books, but doesn’t indicate that it’s necessarily impossible otherwise.


9 comments

Mysterious ancient tracks cut into limestone have recently been found on the island of Malta. The tracks wander, sometimes disappearing under modern structures. Their origin and purpose are unknown, but evidence indicates that they could have connected settlements or water sources. One archaeologist hypothesizes, based on the tracks’ physical appearance and surroundings, that they were made in about 1000 B.C. by animal-drawn carts.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The archaeologist hypothesizes that the mysterious tracks were made by animal-drawn carts in roughly 1000 B.C. This is based on the tracks’ appearance and surroundings.

Notable Assumptions
The archaeologist assumes that the tracks’ origin and date can be deduced by their physical appearance and surroundings.

A
Areas near the tracks have yielded relatively large amounts of fossilized animal excrement dating from approximately 1000 B.C.
Animals were clearly in the area of the tracks around 1000 B.C. This lends support to both the notion that animal-drawn carts made these tracks, and that these tracks were made in 1000 B.C.
B
Some of the tracks connect areas that are sources of fresh water on Malta today.
We don’t care what the tracks connect. We care how they were created in the first place.
C
Some terrain on the island of Malta is more easily traversed on foot than are certain other types of terrain there.
We have no idea if that terrain is the terrain around the tracks.
D
Historically, inhabitants of the island of Malta have not been innovative users of transportation technology.
We have no idea if animal-drawn carts constitute “innovation.” Besides, the Maltese could’ve received this technology from elsewhere.
E
Around 1000 B.C., some settlements were abandoned in parts of Malta.
We care about the tracks. We don’t care what happened to settlements.

6 comments