Critique Β·Author thinks "outcomes analysis" is misguided
I take it that "outcomes analysis" is Zirkel's social science technique. I predict that the next paragraph will tell us why the author thinks that's misguided.
Ah, this makes sense. The cases are too different: quality of evidence; attitude of judge; types of cases; etc. For "outcome analysis" to be predictively useful, a major assumption is that the cases are relevantly similar.
Researcher reads opinions to figure out which variables the judge thought was important in deciding the case. It then uses statistical methods to figure out the causal impact of those variables.
Researcher reads transcripts to figure out which variables and kinds of evidence contributed to the verdict. Presumably the researchers also use statistical tools to figure out causal impact.
Benefit Β·These methods can help parties assess outcome of a potential case
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Problem-analysis
20.
Which one of the following ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ
Question Type
Describe organization
Structure
Rely on your low-res summary to help with this question. P1 introduces βoutcomes analysis.β P2 presents criticism of βoutcomes analysis.β P3 presents two approaches that the author finds more useful than βoutcomes analysis.β
a
A technique is βββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ
This is the best answer. βOutcomes analysisβ is introduced in P1. Its shortcomings are identified in P2. And the author presents two alternative analysis techniques in P3.
b
A debate is βββββββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ βββ β ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The easiest way to eliminate this is to recognize that thereβs no βcompromiseβ reached. The author doesnβt compromise on βoutcomes analysis.β She presents two other techniques she believes are more useful.
c
A theory is ββββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ β ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ
The easiest way to eliminate this is to recognize that thereβs no suggestion for further evaluation at the end. The author criticizes βoutcomes analysisβ and then discusses two better methods.
The easiest way to eliminate this is to recognize that thereβs no amending of criteria at the end. The author criticizes βoutcomes analysisβ and then discusses two better methods.
e
A position is βββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The easiest way to eliminate this is to recognize that thereβs no revising of the authorβs challenge to βoutcomes analysisβ at the end. The author criticizes βoutcomes analysisβ and then discusses two better methods.
Difficulty
97% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%136
142
75%149
Analysis
Describe organization
Structure
Critique or debate
Law
Problem-analysis
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
97%
168
b
1%
157
c
1%
150
d
0%
141
e
1%
160
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.