By the mid-fourteenth century, professional associations of canon lawyers (legal advocates in Christian ecclesiastical courts, which dealt with cases involving marriage, inheritance, and other issues) had appeared in most of Western Europe, and a body of professional standards had been defined for them. ███
Intro topic ·Professional associations of canon lawyers in the mid-14th century
These are lawyers in Christian religious courts. They had professional standards and were common in Western Europe.
Support 1 ·English civil courts (non-religious) have much more disciplinary action
Those courts had ethical standards similar to the religious courts. So, disparity in number of disciplinary actions is probably due to religious courts' inefficient enforcement mechanisms. It's unlikely that religious lawyers were simply much more unethical than civil lawyers.
Result of complaints (related to support 2) ·Induced religious lawyers to defend themselves from criticism
Complaints may have encouraged lawyers to form professional associations and to de-prioritize disciplining fellow lawyers.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
7.
Which one of the following ████ ██████ ███ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Main point
In a Phenomenon-Hypothesis passage, if the author supports a hypothesis, the MP is typically the hypothesis the author supports. In P3 and P4, the author supports the hypothesis that the reason professional associations of canon lawyers didn’t play a prominent role in enforcing standards of conduct is that disciplinary mechanisms were inefficient. In the last paragraph, the author elaborates on this inefficiency – professional associations for canon lawyers apparently were focused more on defending lawyers from criticism than on disciplining misbehaving lawyers. This is why they were inefficient at enforcing conduct rules.
This doesn’t capture the author’s explanation for the inefficient disciplinary enforcement of canon lawyer associations. In addition, it’s unsupported, because we have no reason to think the associations “only” enforced ethical standards when provoked by outside criticism. We have reason to think the associations would strengthen their defense of their own members when facing criticism.
This may be supported, but it’s not the overall main point. This doesn’t capture the author’s explanation for the inefficient disciplinary enforcement of canon lawyer associations.
This may be supported, but it’s not the overall main point. This doesn’t capture the author’s explanation for the inefficient disciplinary enforcement of canon lawyer associations.
This doesn’t capture the author’s explanation for the inefficient disciplinary enforcement of canon lawyer associations.
Difficulty
83% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is significantly easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%124
140
75%156
Analysis
Main point
Law
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
7%
160
b
8%
161
c
83%
166
d
2%
161
e
1%
153
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.