Support All any reporter knows about the accident is what the press agent has said. ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ βββββ βββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ
The author concludes that some reporter can scoop all of the other reporters. This is based on the following:
All that any reporter knows about the accident is what the press agent said.
If the agent told every reporter everything, then each reporter knows the same amount as every other reporter.
If each reporter knows the same amount as every other reporter, a scoop is not possible.
But, the press agent did not tell every reporter everything.
The author assumes that if the agent did not tell every reporter everything, that at least one reporter knows more than every other reporter. This assumption is faulty because itβs possible each reporter still knows the same amount as every other reporter, even if the agent withheld some information.
Analysis by KevinLin
The argument's reasoning is flawed βββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ
The press agent βββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
Even if some ββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ
Some reporter may ββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββ
The press agent βββ βββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ
No reporter knows βββ ββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββββ