The concept of appropriateness (absent in social-benefit rationale) is what accounts for the intuition of proportionality in punishment. It's not about beneficial punishment. It's about just punishment.
Critique of and Alternate Solution ·Intuition can be justified with social-benefit rationale
The retributivist notions of appropriateness, proportionality, and justice can be reframed as balancing benefit to society against cost to the individual.
Actual Answer / Main Point ·The retributivist intuitions are grounded in social-benefit rationale
Passage Style
Single position
14.
As described in the second ██████████ ███ ██████ █████████ ███ █████████ █████████ ██ ████ ██████████ ████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
Question Type
Implied
Principle or generalization
The second rationale is the retributivist rationale: “The second rationale is that a punishment is justified by the severity of the crime, independent of any benefit to society.”
a
The correctness of ██ ██████ ███████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██ ███ ████████ █████████
Supported. Under this rationale, the consequences (benefit to society) aren’t a consideration; what matters is what’s fair given the severity of the crime.
b
The correctness of ██ ██████ ███████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██ ████ ███████ █████ ████████
Not supported, because the retributive rationale depends on what’s fair given the severity of the crime; what society “deems correct” is not a consideration.
c
The correctness of ██ ██████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ████████ █████████
Anti-supported, because the retributive rationale, as described by P2, doesn’t take into account consequences (social benefit).
d
The correctness of ██ ██████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███ ██████ ██ ███ █████████ ██████████
Anti-supported, because the retributive rationale, as described by P2, doesn’t take into account consequences (social benefit).
e
The correctness of ██ ██████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ █████████████
Anti-supported, because the retributive rationale, as described by P2, doesn’t take into account consequences (social benefit).
Difficulty
64% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is slightly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%147
158
75%170
Analysis
Implied
Principle or generalization
Law
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
64%
168
b
3%
161
c
8%
162
d
7%
161
e
18%
161
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.