Many of us can conceive of penalties that seem disproportionate to the crimes they are intended to punish. βββ
βββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ
βββ βββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ ββββββββββββ βββ
ββββββββ ββ βββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββ ββββββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ β ββββββββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ β ββββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββββββββ βββββββ βββββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ βββ βββ ββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββ βββ
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ
Of the two ββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββ βββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββββ βββββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ
"The retributivist rationale can be shown to be more fundamental" is false. It is antisupported. Author tries to reframe the retributivist rationale in terms of the social-benefit rationale.
Although social benefit βββββββ ββ ββ β ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββ ββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββ βββ βββ βββββββββββ βββββββββββββ ββββββββββ
"Although social benefit appears to be a reasonable rationale" is the wrong positioning to take on the social-benefit rationale. It's setting up the rest of the claim to say something negative about it. That can't be the main point.
Because the retributivist βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββ ββ β βββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββββββ
"Retributivist rationale... is able to support our intuitions... in a way that the social-benefit rationale cannot." That can't be the main point. The main point favors the social-benefit rationale.
Because the rationale ββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ βββββββ ββ ββ ββββ ββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ β ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ β ββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ
"Punishment of a criminal can be justified only if it produces a social benefit that outweighs the harm it brings to the criminal" is unsupported. Swap out the "only if" for "if" and (D) would be supported but still not the main point.
Although it appears ββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββ βββββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββ ββββ ββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββ
The "it" refers to "the rationale that punishments ought to fit crimes," which is a reference to the retributivist rationale. (E) correctly characterizes that rationale as grounded in the concept of benefit.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnostic