PT105.S4.Q6 > Question

SECTION 1 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

SECTION 3 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 4 · lr

Lopez and Simmons’ decision is foolish because it leads to an undesirable consequence, and there’s an alternative that avoids this consequence.

The conclusion is the author’s condemnation of Lopez and Simmons’ decision: “Their decision is foolish.”

The author makes no judgment about the initial application to the company.

There’s no explicit mention of how often this rule is enforced. The author assumes that it will be enforced in this case (she is certain that one person will have their offer withdrawn), but this doesn’t address overall frequency of enforcement.

This is a paraphrase of the idea that their decision is “foolish.”

The conclusion isn’t about what Evritech should or should not do. It’s about what the married couple should or should not do.

PrepTest 105 - Section 4 - Question 6

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action