Many people complain about corporations, but there are also those whose criticism goes further and who hold corporations morally to blame for many of the problems in Western society. █████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███████ ████████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████ █████████ ████████ ██ ██████ █████████ █████ ██ ████ ████ ████████ ███████ ███████ ██████ ██ ███████ ████ █████████ ████ ██████████ ██ ███ ██████ █████ ███
Some people's view ·Corporations are immoral when they ignore their impacts on the public good
Premise ·Public good outweighs obligation to maximize profits
CEO should serve public good even when it's not in owners' interest
Passage Style
Critique or debate
18.
The discussion of the paper ████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ █████████ ██ ████████ █████████ ██
Question Type
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
This asks for the purpose of the paper mill discussion in the broader context of the passage. The paper mill is brought up as an example to illustrate how sometimes, maximizing profit does not benefit the public. The author uses this example to directly counter the economists' claim that maximizing profit always turns out best for the public.
a
offer an actual ████ ██ █████████ █████████ ████████
It’s a hypothetical example, not an actual case. The author’s just talking about the possibility of something that would harm the public good while maximizing profit. He never offers any actual cases of unethical corporate behavior.
The economists contend that maximization of profits necessarily benefits the public. The paper mill example refutes this by illustrating how maximizing profit can potentially be at odds with benefiting the public.
The author never considers the ease or difficulty of enforcing ethical restrictions. He just argues that corporations should adhere to certain ethical restrictions (namely, not acting against the public good).
d
demonstrate that corporations ███ ███████████ ███ ████ ██████ ████
Too strong. The paper mill example merely demonstrates that there’s a possibility of corporations harming public interests in their pursuit of profit—not that corporations are, in fact, responsible for many ills.
e
deny that corporations ███ ███████ ██ ██████ ███████
Too strong. The paper mill example merely demonstrates that there’s a possibility of corporations acting immorally in their pursuit of profit. Also, recall that the author’s main point is that corporations have a responsibility to act morally—this suggests that he believes they’re at least capable of doing so.
Difficulty
96% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%133
140
75%148
Analysis
Purpose in context (of word, phrase, or idea)
Structure
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
2%
156
b
96%
166
c
1%
155
d
0%
155
e
0%
143
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.