PT110.S2.Q9 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12

PASSAGE 3

Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18

PASSAGE 4

Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

PASSAGE 2

Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14

PASSAGE 3

Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

The author concludes that there’s no need to look further for an explanation of the difference between the results the university study arrived at and the results the governmental study arrived at because each study used a different method of investigation.

The author reasons that since the university study and governmental study used different methods of investigation, there’s no need to look for another explanation of the studies arriving at different results. However, the argument is flawed because the author fails to consider that two studies using different methods of investigation doesn’t guarantee that they’ll arrive at different results. Different investigation methods can arrive at the same result.

We don’t know that the governmental study was produced for the purpose of the operation of government. The government could’ve produced it for a different reason.

The author only discusses the method of investigation for each study. The author doesn’t discuss purpose.

We have no idea if either of the studies have or haven’t been properly conducted.

The argument commits this flaw. The author argues that the studies arriving at different results is explained by them using different methods of investigation, without recognizing that the studies could’ve arrived at the same results with different methods of investigation.

The argument isn’t concerned with economic conditions. The author only argues that the studies arriving at different results is explained by them using different methods of investigation.

PrepTest 110 - Section 2 - Question 9

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action