Conclusion Marian Anderson, the famous contralto, did not take success for granted. ██ ████ ████ ███████ ████████ ███ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ███ ███ ██ ████████ █████ ██ ████ ██ ████ ██ ████ █ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████
Anderson did not take success for granted. This is because she had to struggle early in life, and anyone who struggles early is able to keep a good perspective.
The conclusion is about not taking success for granted, but none of the premises mention taking success for granted. We need to link the two. For example, suppose that anyone with a good perspective does not take success for granted. That would guarantee the author’s conclusion that Anderson did not take success for granted.
Note that assuming anyone who had to struggle early does not take success for granted would also guarantee the conclusion. But it’s more common on the LSAT for the right answer to use all inferences available from the stimulus.
The conclusion of the argument ███████ █████████ ██ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████████
Anyone who succeeds █████ ███████ ███ ████████
Anyone who is ████ ██ ████ █ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ████ ███ ████ ███████ ███ ████████
Anyone who is ████ ██ ████ █ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ █████ ███ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █████
Anyone who does ███ ████ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ████████ █████ ██ █████
Anyone who does ███ ████ ███████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ██ ████ █ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ██████