Geneticist: Ethicists have fears, many of them reasonable, about the prospect of cloning human beings, that is, producing exact genetic duplicates. βββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββ ββ β βββββββ ββββββ ββββββββ ββ ββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββ ββ ββββββ βββ βββββββββ β βββββββββ βββββββ ββββ βββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ ββββββββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββ ββββββ ββββββ βββββββ
The geneticist concludes that the βhorror-movie imageβ of human cloning producing an army of duplicates for wealthy people is an unrealistic fear. To support this, she says that the long-term process of raising and educating clones would mean that adults produced by cloning would not have identical goals, outlook, or personality, so an βarmy of exact duplicatesβ could not be produced. Then, the geneticist raises another, more realistic, outcome: using clones as living βorgan banks.β
The claim in the question stem gives a reason that the fear of cloning producing an army of duplicates is an unrealistic fear.
The claim that cloning will βββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββββ βββββββββββββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ
It is a ββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββββ ββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ
It is evidence ββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββββββββββ
It illustrates the βββββ ββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββββββ
It is evidence βββ βββ βββββ ββββ βββββββ ββββββ βββββ βββ βββββββ ββββββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββ βββ ββββββββββββββββ
It is a ββββββ βββ βββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββ βββββββ