With the elimination of the apartheid system, South Africa now confronts the transition to a rights-based legal system in a constitutional democracy. ███
Intro topic ·South Africa's transition to a rights-based legal system
Concern ·New system is less rule-bound, and more interpretative
A constitutional court will hear arguments on whether laws passed by p arliament are constitutional. This has never happened in South Africa before, so there is uncertainty.
Elaborate on concern ·May be difficult to foster rights-based culture
Society is multiracial, with a wide range of political beliefs. The constitution's bill of rights is described very generally, and there's no legal precedent to help determine its meaning.
Use of international law ·Can look to other countries' legal precedent, but need to be careful
Some scholars think that SA judges might blindly follow other countries' interpretations of their own constitutions. But, scholars are optimistic that SA judges will develop their own precedent over time.
Additional source of difficulty ·SA citizens suspicious of law
Law in SA has traditionally been tool of oppression, so citizens break and oppose laws.
Passage Style
Problem-analysis
Single position
23.
The passage suggests that the ████████ ████████ ██████ ███ ███████████ ██ ███████ ███ █ ████████████ █████ ██████ ██ █████ ██████ ██ ████ ██████ ███ ██
Question Type
Author’s attitude
Implied
Although the author describes difficulties the new legal system will face, the author doesn’t suggest that she believes the new system is likely to fail. The mere description of difficulties does not imply that the author thinks those difficulties will be hard to overcome. So the author’s attitude toward success of the legal system isn’t negative.
Is it positive? Not clearly. She doesn’t indicate that the system is likely to succeed. She does point out that scholars are “hopeful” that South Africa will develop a body of precedent that addresses the needs of its citizens. This might show some slight optimism. But overall it’s not clear what to predict, except that we don’t want an answer that’s very negative.
a
deep skepticism
This is too negative. The author doesn’t suggest that she’s skeptical the new system will succeed. Although she discusses difficulties the system will face, that doesn’t imply a belief that those difficulties are unlikely to be overcome.
b
open pessimism
This is too negative. The author doesn’t suggest that she’s pessimistic the new system will succeed. Although she discusses difficulties the system will face, that doesn’t imply a belief that those difficulties are unlikely to be overcome.
c
total indifference
The author isn’t indifferent. There’s evidence she’s interested in the success of the new legal system. Why else would she write a passage describing difficulties that the system would face? At the very least she shows some scholarly interest in the issue; so we can’t describe her opinion as “total indifference.”
d
guarded optimism
This is the best answer. The author is guardedly optimistic in that she recognizes the many difficulties facing the new legal system, but also indicates that scholars are hopeful they can overcome at least one of these difficulties. If you don’t think this answer is perfect, that’s fine. It’s the best available answer.
e
complete confidence
This is too strongly positive. The author doesn’t say anything suggesting that she thinks all the difficulties facing the new legal system will be overcome.
Difficulty
88% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%121
135
75%149
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Law
Problem-analysis
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
3%
153
b
3%
152
c
5%
158
d
88%
160
e
1%
148
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.