Subscription pricing
passage 1
P1
The jury trial is one of the handful of democratic institutions that allow individual citizens, rather than the government, to make important societal decisions. █ ███████ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ███████ ████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ████████ ██ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██████ ██ ████████ █████ ████ ████████████ ██████████ ██████ ████ ██████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ████████ ███ █████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████████ ███ █████████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ████ ██ ██████████ █████ ███ █████ ██████ ████████ ███ ████████ ███
Intro to Topic ·
Unanimity as a requirement in jury trials
This requirement compels the jury to deliberate fully and truly before reaching its verdict.
Critics ·
of unanimity
Unanimity can result in hung juries (deadlock) which hampers the judicial system by forcing a retrial. Critics recommend discarding unanimity.
P2
███ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ █████████ ████████ ███
Critique (of the Critics) / Main Point ·
The costs of a hung jury do not outweigh the benefits of unanimity
Sounds like the conclusion. Let's see if the author can back up this cost-benefit argument.
Premise 1 ·
Jury trials are rare and hung juries even more rare
Premise 2 ·
Hung juries is not a bad thing; it's a sign that the system is working
P3
█████████ █████████ ████████ █ ██████ ██████ ████ █ ██████ ███ ████ █ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ███████████████████ ██ ████ █████ ███████ ██████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ████████████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ███████████ █████ ████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ███ ████ █████████ ███
Premise 3 ·
Unanimity increases chances of fair verdict
Decreases chances of a false conviction
Premise 4 ·
Dissenting opinion is an important part of the deliberation process
Loss of unanimity will undermine society's confidence in the verdict.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
6.
The author explicitly claims that █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ ██ █ ██████ ██ ████████ █ ███████ ██████████ ███████ ██ ██ ██████████
a
Only verdicts in ████ █████ █████ █████ ██ █████████
b
The responsibility felt ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ █████ ██ █████████
c
Society's confidence in ███ ████████ ██ ███ ████████ █████ ██ ███████████
d
The problem of ████ ██████ █████ ███ ██ ██████ ███ █████ ███████ ████ ███████████
e
An important flaw ████ █████ ██ ███████ ████ ███ ████████ ███████ ███████