Rosen: One cannot prepare a good meal from bad food, produce good food from bad soil, maintain good soil without good farming, or have good farming without a culture that places value on the proper maintenance of all its natural resources so that needed supplies are always available.
Good meal → NOT bad food
Good food → NOT bad soil
Good soil → Good farming
Good farming → culture that places value on maintaining natural resources
Normally, I wouldn’t think “NOT bad food” implies “good food,” since there might be something that’s just not bad and not good — just middle-of-the-road food. Same thing with “NOT bad soil” and “good soil.”
But, the stimulus seems to be set up in order for us to draw a conditional chain connecting every statement.
Good meal → good food → good soil → good farming → culture that places value on maintining natural resources.
I know this seems inappropriate, but consider this problem unusual, and don’t draw too many lessons from it. Think of this problem as an exception.
Which one of the following ███ ██ ████████ ████████ ████ ███████ ██████████
The creation of ████ █████ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ███ ████████ ███████████
Natural resources cannot ██ ██████████ ████████ ███████ ████ ███████ ██████████
Good soil is █ ████████████ ██ ████ ████████
Any society with ████ ████████ ██████ ████ ████ █ ████ ████████
When food is ████ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ████ ████ ████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ██████████