The myth persists that in 1492 the Western Hemisphere was an untamed wilderness and that it was European settlers who harnessed and transformed its ecosystems. ███ ███████████ █████ ████ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████ ████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ████████████ ██████████ ███████ ██████████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ███
Intro topic ·Misconception that Europeans were the first to tame wilderness
In fact, Native Americans altered the forest before Europeans.
Additional Support ·Nicaraguan pine forests today grow in areas that were burned
This probably also happened in the past. Pine forests were found only where there were Native American settlements. When the settlements left, the pine forests disappeared.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
4.
Which one of the following ██ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ ██████████ ███████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ███████ ██ ██████████
Question Type
Stated
This Stated question asks for evidence of pre-European controlled burning in the tropics. We know that controlled burning in the tropics is discussed in P3.
a
extensive homogeneous forests ██ ████ █████████
Actually, the extensive homogeneous high elevation pine forests in Guatemala and Mexico are cited as an example of natural, prehuman forests, so the author does not claim that these forests were a result of controlled burning.
b
extensive homogeneous forests ██ ███ █████████
This is the evidence of controlled burning in the tropics before the arrival of Europeans. These are the pine-dominant forests of Nicaragua (which are lower in elevation than the pine-dominant forests of Guatemala and Mexico). These homogenous pine-dominant forests were present when Europeans arrived and they are found where there has been regular burning.
c
extensive heterogeneous forests ██ ████ █████████
The passage doesn’t mention extensive heterogeneous high elevation forests, so this isn’t the evidence that we’re looking for.
d
extensive heterogeneous forests ██ ███ █████████
This is what is expected of natural forests (which we know because burning converts heterogeneous forests to homogenous forests), so this wouldn’t be evidence of controlled burning.
The author cites sedimentary charcoal accumulations, but this is evidence from the northeastern United States, while this question is asking for evidence from the tropics.
Difficulty
69% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is significantly harder than the average question in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%143
153
75%164
Analysis
Stated
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
9%
156
b
69%
164
c
3%
156
d
7%
159
e
13%
156
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.