With the approach of the twentieth century, the classical wave theory of radiation—a widely accepted theory in physics—began to encounter obstacles. ████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ███████████████ ███████████████ ██████ ████████ ████ █████ ███ █ ████ ██ █████ ████████████ █████████ ████ ███ ██████████████ ██ ███ ████ ██ ██████ ███
Challenge to Existing Theory ·Classical wave theory claims that all radiation exists as waves
If this theory is being challenged, that must mean that some (or all?) radiation doesn't take the form of waves?
Theory's Assumption ·Wavelength and energy are continuous
Continuous means that any conceivable energy value could occur in nature. But if that's the assumption, then it probably will turn out to be false. So... what's the opposing concept to "continuous?"
Phenomenon (Unexplained by Wave Theory) ·"Blackbody" radiation
"Blackbody" radiation is the heat(?) emitted by an object. The object is black so that it doesn't reflect other forms of radiation (e.g., light in the visible wavelengths). That way, physicists can be sure that they're measuring radiation emitted by the object, as opposed to radiation that merely bounced off that object.
Prediction False ·Physicists found almost no short wavelength radiation
The theory predicted that they would find a lot of short wavelength radiation, e.g., ultraviolet radiation. But experimental results contradicted that prediction.
New Hypothesis ·Planck theorized that energy was discrete
Planck discarded wave theory's energy continuum (like a smooth turning dial). He didn't think that energy could take on any value. He hypothesized that energy could only take on discrete values. So to move from one energy level to the next involves a jump (like a dial that clicked into place).
New Theory ·Einstein theorized that radiation is composed of particles called photons
Photons can be emitted only in discrete units and at certain wavelengths, corroborating Planck's hypothesis.
Passage Style
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Single position
22.
The primary function of the █████ ███ ██████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ██
Question Type
Purpose of paragraph
Structure
In P1, the author describes wave theory and an assumption underlying it. In P2, the author describes how evidence challenged that assumption. These paragraphs are designed to set up the author’s later discussion of Planck’s hypothesis.
a
describe the process ██ █████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ █ █████████ ██████
Although P2 shows how evidence is inconsistent with wave theory’s assumption, it doesn’t show how a competing theory undermines wave theory’s assumption. Later in the passage we get Planck’s hypothesis, which might be characterized as a competing theory, but this doesn’t imply that the competing theory did any dismantling or that the author’s purpose in P2, before the competing theory is mentioned, is to describe how a competing theory dismantled wave theory’s assumption.
b
introduce a central ██████████ ██ █ ██████████ ██████ ███ ███ ████████████ ████████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ██ ████ ██████
This best captures the purpose of P1 and P2 as explained below the question stem. P1 introduces a “fundamental assumption” of wave theory and P2 describes evidence that eventually led to the discarding of wave theory.
We don’t get a description of competing theories in P1 or P2.
d
describe the process ██ █████████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ███████
We don’t get any description of retesting of wave theory in P1 or P2. P2 doesn’t describe any additional experiments beyond those that produced evidence inconsistent with wave theory. In addition, there’s no indication that the experiments that produced evidence inconsistent with wave theory were intended to “retest” wave theory.
e
provide the basis ███ ██ ████████ ████████ ██ ███████ █ ███ ██████
The author doesn’t make an argument intended to dismiss any “new theory.” Rather, the passage describes how Planck’s hypothesis overturned wave theory. Planck’s hypothesis is the new theory — the author never argues that it should be dismissed.
Difficulty
82% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%136
146
75%157
Analysis
Purpose of paragraph
Structure
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Single position
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
6%
157
b
82%
163
c
3%
153
d
6%
156
e
3%
157
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.