Essayist: Conclusion Earth is a living organism, composed of other organisms much as animals are composed of cells, not merely a thing upon which creatures live. ββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββ βββ ββ ββββ ββ ββββ β ββββββββββ βββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββββ ββββββββββββββββ ββββββββ ββββ βββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ ββββββββ βββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββββββ ββββ βββββββ βββββββββββββ
The essayist concludes that Earth is a living organism. As support for this conclusion, the essayist says that it can be said that Earth has a metabolism and can regulate its temperature and humidity. The essayist then anticipates and rejects a counter argument: the essayist concedes that Earth does not breathe, but to show that breathing is not necessary for being considered an organism, cites the example of insects, which are organisms that do not breathe.
The assertion in the question stem is used to reject the counter-argument that the essayist anticipates. The assertion in the question stem demonstrates why it is not relevant to the essayistβs conclusion that the Earth does not literally breathe.
Analysis by ZoeLight
The assertion that insects do βββ βββββββββ βββββββ βββββ βββββ βββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββββ ββ βββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ
a reason for βββ βββββββββ βββββββ ββββββ ββ ββ ββββββββ ββ βββ βββββ ββ βββ βββ βββββββββ
a reason for βββββββββ ββ βββββ βββ ββββββ ββββ βββββ ββ β ββββββ ββββββββ
an illustration of βββ βββββββ βββββ ββββ ββ ββ ββ βββββββββ β ββββββββ ββββ ββββ β ββββββββββ
an example of β ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββββ βββββββ ββββ ββββββββ ββ βββββββ
an illustration of β ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββ βββββ ββ ββββββββ