Unsupported. The directors say here that lawyers will get contact with people who wouldn’t otherwise be using legal services, and that this will help bring them more business. But we don’t know if lawyers will gain expertise in a diverse range of legal services, or if they’ll have “diverse clientele.”

Unsupported. The directors don’t distinguish between experienced and inexperienced lawyers, nor do they argue that some lawyers will enjoy higher profits from complex cases. They argue that lawyers benefit from the CAW plan because they’ll get more clients through referrals, and those clients will pay the standard rate.

Supported. In P2, we see that the directors think lawyers will benefit from taking clients at lower rates through the CAW plan because they’ll get more clients through referrals, and those clients will pay the standard rate. This suggests that the directors believe the lawyers’ lower profits from the plan will be offset by gaining more business through referrals.

Unsupported. The directors never suggest that the plan’s lower fees will draw clients away from other firms. In fact, they say that the plan will help lawyers get contact with people who wouldn’t otherwise be using legal services at all.

Unsupported. The author thinks that prepaid legal plans will cause a downward pressure on legal fees and lower profits for lawyers. The proponents of the plan think that the plan will bring lawyers more business through referrals.