The moral precepts embodied in the Hippocratic oath, which physicians standardly affirm upon beginning medical practice, have long been considered the immutable bedrock of medical ethics, binding physicians in a moral community that reaches across temporal, cultural, and national barriers. βββββ ββββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββ βββββββββ βββ βββ βββββββ βββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ βββ ββ βββββββ ββ βββββββ βββββββββ ββ ββββββββββββ βββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββββββββ ββββββββββββββββββ ββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββ ββββββ βββββββββββ βββ βββ
Intro topic Β·Hippocratic oath as basis of medical ethics
Oath to act in patients' best interests and adopt standards of professional conduct
Requires doctors to prioritize individual patient needs over broader societal considerations. Also limits role of market forces in driving quality and availability of care.
Example of solution Β·Oath previously reinterpreted to allow surgery
Passage Style
Critique or debate
8.
Which one of the following ββββ ββββββββββ βββββββββ βββ ββββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ
Question Type
Describe organization
Structure
Think back to your low-res summary to help answer this question. P1 starts by telling us about the Hippocratic oath. Then we get the view of critics of the oath. In P2, the author rebuts the criticsβ argument and recommends what we should do with the oath.
(A) goes wrong at the end. The author doesnβt βmodifyβ the oath in light of the criticisms presented in the first paragraph. The author instead advocates for keeping the core value of the oath while being open to minor adaptations. The example at the end involving a reinterpretation of the phrase βcutting for the stoneβ is not an example of the authorβs modification of the oath. Itβs an example of how we already engage in reinterpretation of the oath. But the author never suggests any particular modifications that should be made to the oath.
b
A set of ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββββββ βββ ββββββββ βββββββ ββ βββββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ βββ ββββββββββ
The author doesnβt βconsider and dismissβ replies to the criticisms in P1. The author is the one who brings up replies to the criticism; it wouldnβt make sense for the author to dismiss her own reply to the criticism.
c
The history of β βββββββ ββββ ββ βββββββ ββ ββββββββββ ββββββββββ ββ βββ ββββ βββ βββββββββ βββ βββββββββ βββββββββ βββ βββ ββββ ββ ββββββββ ββ β βββββββββ
The author doesnβt βmodifyβ the oath in light of the criticisms presented in the first paragraph. The author instead advocates for keeping the core value of the oath while being open to minor adaptations. The example at the end involving a reinterpretation of the phrase βcutting for the stoneβ is not an example of the authorβs modification of the oath. Itβs an example of how we already engage in reinterpretation of the oath. But the author never suggests any particular modifications that should be made.
The author doesnβt βformulateβ (create) a general principle. The passage concerns a principle that has already been formed (the Hippocratic oath).
This best captures the organization. The tradition surrounding the Hippocratic oath is discussed (beginning of P1), criticsβ view of the oath is mentioned (end of P1), and the author rebuts that criticism (P2).
Difficulty
70% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%143
155
75%166
Analysis
Describe organization
Structure
Critique or debate
Humanities
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
16%
160
b
1%
157
c
11%
161
d
2%
160
e
70%
166
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account belowβit only takes a minuteβand then youβre free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.