Alice: Support In democracies, politicians garner support by emphasizing the differences between their opponents and themselves. ███████ ████ ████ ████ ██ ██████ ████ █████ █████████ ████████ ██ ███████████ █████████ ██████ ██ ███ █████ ████████ ████████
███████ ███ ███████ ████████ █████████ ██ ███ ████████ ████████ ██████████ ██ ████████████ ███████████ ███████ ███ ██ █████████ █████ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██████ ████ ████ ███ ████████
Alice argues that in democracies, policies change wildly between different governing parties. Why does this happen? Because parties get votes by focusing on their differences. They then have to govern based on those campaign promises. This means that each new government will enact very different policies from the previous government.
Elwell doesn’t state a conclusion, but implies the conclusion that policy doesn’t change that dramatically between governing parties. Why not? Because whoever gets elected must usually compromise to form a coalition, so actual policies are less extreme than the campaign would suggest.
We’re looking for a disagreement. Alice and Elwell disagree about their conclusions: whether or not policies wildly fluctuate between governing parties in a democracy.
The statements above provide the ████ ███████ ███ ███ █████ ████ █████ ███ ██████ ████████ █████ ███████
politicians heighten the ███████████ ███████ ██████████ ███ █████ █████████ ██████ █████████
basic policies change ███████████ ████ ███ █████ ████████ ███████ ██ █ █████████
in a democracy ███ ████ ███ ██ ████████ ██████████ ██ ████████ ██ ██ ████ █ █████████ ██████████
most voters stay █████ ██ █ ██████████ █████████ █████ ████ ██ ██ ███████ ███ █████ ██ ██████████ ██████
the desire of ███████ ██ █████ ████████ ██████████ █████ ██ ███████ ██████████ ███████