PT119.S4.Q3 > Question

SECTION 1 · rc

PASSAGE 1

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7

PASSAGE 2

Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15

PASSAGE 3

Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21

PASSAGE 4

Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25 Question 26 Question 27

SECTION 2 · lr

Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Question 7 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 Question 11 Question 12 Question 13 Question 14 Question 15 Question 16 Question 17 Question 18 Question 19 Question 20 Question 21 Question 22 Question 23 Question 24 Question 25

SECTION 3 · lr

SECTION 4 · lr

Robin lived through extraordinary childhood circumstances.

Robin committed an offense.

Robin doesn’t know the moral difference between right and wrong.

Robin did not recognize that her offense was morally wrong.

Robin does know the difference between what is legally permitted and what is not.

Robin did recognize that her offense was illegal.

Robin’s offense was illegal.

Robin’s offense was morally wrong.

Anti-supported. Robin committed an offense that was illegal, meaning it was not legally permissible.

Very strongly supported. In telling us that Robin didn’t recognize that the offense she committed was morally wrong, the author implies that the act was, in fact, wrong, although Robin did not realize it.

Unsupported. The stimulus doesn’t indicate whether Robin’s moral ignorance constitutes a legal excuse for her behavior.

Unsupported. The stimulus gives no information about what was or was not theoretically possible under the circumstances of Robin’s childhood.

Unsupported. The stimulus gives no information about Robin’s capacity to learn the moral difference between right and wrong.

PrepTest 119 - Section 4 - Question 3

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action